Le questionnaire sur les attitudes envers la neurodiversité : élaboration et validation initiale

Titre original en anglais : The Neurodiversity Attitudes Questionnaire: Development and Initial Validation

Sources de métadonnées utilisées pour cette référence

OpenAlex Crossref OpenCitations
En savoir plus sur les sources utilisées

Schuck, R. K., Choi, S., Baiden, K. M. P., Dwyer, P., & Uljarević, M. (2024). The Neurodiversity Attitudes Questionnaire: Development and Initial Validation. Autism, 28(11), 2821-2833. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613241245756

Date de publication: 28/04/2024 Ajout dans AutiHub: 05/07/2026 Type: Article Langue de l’article: Anglais
Source OpenAlex Source éditeur (DOI) Texte intégral

Cette publication est intégrée dans AutiHub via :

Auteurs

Auteur·ices des publications
5
Auteur·ices de la publication identifié·es comme autistes
1 / 5 (20,0 %)
  1. Rachel K. Schuck
  2. Sunghee Choi
  3. Kaitlynn M. P. Baiden
  4. Patrick Dwyer *
  5. Mirko Uljarević

Résumé

La neurodiversité renvoie à l'idée que tous les cerveaux, quelles que soient leurs différences, ont de la valeur et devraient être acceptés. Les attitudes envers la perspective de la neurodiversité peuvent avoir des répercussions concrètes sur la vie des personnes neurodivergentes, allant des effets sur les interactions quotidiennes à la manière dont les professionnels fournissent des services aux personnes neurodivergentes. Afin d'identifier les attitudes négatives envers la neurodiversité et, potentiellement, d'intervenir pour les améliorer, nous devons d'abord mesurer ces attitudes. Cet article décrit l'élaboration et la validation initiale du Neurodiversity Attitudes Questionnaire (NDAQ), y compris la révision des items sur la base de l'examen par des experts, des entretiens cognitifs, l'évaluation systématique du processus de réponse des participants et l'analyse de la structure factorielle interne de l'instrument au moyen d'une modélisation exploratoire par équations structurelles. Une analyse pilote menée auprès de 351 personnes vivant majoritairement aux Etats-Unis et travaillant actuellement dans des professions d'aide ou ayant l'intention d'en exercer indique que le NDAQ présente une validité de construit, est bien compris par les participants et correspond à une structure à cinq facteurs. Bien que le NDAQ représente le premier instrument conçu pour évaluer spécifiquement les attitudes envers la perspective de la neurodiversité, des travaux de validation supplémentaires sont encore nécessaires. Résumé grand public La neurodiversité renvoie à l'idée que les différences cérébrales, y compris les handicaps, ont de la valeur et devraient être acceptées. Les attitudes envers la neurodiversité peuvent avoir des répercussions concrètes sur la vie des personnes neurodivergentes, c'est-à-dire celles dont les cerveaux ne correspondent pas à la « norme » de la société. Ces répercussions peuvent inclure des effets sur les interactions quotidiennes, ainsi que sur la manière dont des professionnels tels que les enseignants et les médecins fournissent des services aux personnes neurodivergentes. Afin d'identifier les attitudes négatives envers la neurodiversité et, potentiellement, de les améliorer, nous devons d'abord mesurer ces attitudes. Cet article décrit l'élaboration du Neurodiversity Attitudes Questionnaire (NDAQ). L'élaboration du NDAQ comprenait la révision des items du questionnaire sur la base des retours d'experts et de personnes neurodivergentes, l'évaluation systématique de la manière dont les participants répondaient aux items du questionnaire, et l'analyse de la façon dont les items du NDAQ sont regroupés en différents facteurs. Une analyse préliminaire menée auprès de 351 personnes vivant majoritairement aux Etats-Unis, qui travaillaient alors dans une profession d'aide ou prévoyaient d'y travailler, par exemple médecins, enseignants, thérapeutes, etc., indique que le NDAQ mesure les attitudes envers la neurodiversité, est bien compris par les participants et correspond à une structure à cinq facteurs. Bien que le NDAQ représente le premier instrument conçu pour évaluer spécifiquement les attitudes envers l'idée générale de neurodiversité, des travaux supplémentaires sont encore nécessaires.

Neurodiversity refers to the idea that all brains—no matter their differences—are valuable and should be accepted. Attitudes toward the neurodiversity perspective can have real-life impacts on the lives of neurodivergent people, from effects on daily interactions to how professionals deliver services for neurodivergent individuals. In order to identify negative attitudes toward neurodiversity and potentially intervene to improve them, we first need to measure these attitudes. This article describes the development and initial validation of the Neurodiversity Attitudes Questionnaire (NDAQ), including item revision based on expert review, cognitive interviews, systematic evaluation of participants’ response process, and analysis of the instrument’s internal factor structure using exploratory structural equation modeling. Pilot analysis with 351 individuals mostly living in the United States who were currently working in or intending to pursue helping professions indicates that the NDAQ has construct validity, is well understood by participants, and fits a five-factor structure. While the NDAQ represents the first instrument designed to specifically assess attitudes toward the neurodiversity perspective, further validation work is still needed. Lay Abstract Neurodiversity refers to the idea that brain differences (including disabilities) are valuable and should be accepted. Attitudes toward neurodiversity can have real-life impacts on the lives of neurodivergent people (those whose brains do not fit society’s “standard”). These impacts can include effects on daily interactions, as well as how professionals such as teachers and doctors deliver services to neurodivergent people. In order to identify negative attitudes toward neurodiversity and potentially improve them, we first need to measure these attitudes. This article describes the development of the Neurodiversity Attitudes Questionnaire (NDAQ). NDAQ development included revision of questionnaire items based on feedback from experts and neurodivergent people, systematically evaluating the way participants responded to questionnaire items, and analysis of how the NDAQ items are grouped into different factors. A preliminary analysis with 351 individuals mostly living in the United States who were currently working or planning to work in a helping profession (e.g. doctors, teachers, therapists, and so on) indicates that the NDAQ measures attitudes toward neurodiversity, is well understood by participants, and fits a five-factor structure. While the NDAQ represents the first instrument designed to specifically assess attitudes toward the broad idea of neurodiversity, further work is still needed.

Bibliographie citée par cette référence

Les références citées sont importées depuis des sources externes de métadonnées lorsqu’elles sont disponibles. La liste peut être partielle.

Vue d’ensemble de l’inclusion dans la bibliographie

Ces indicateurs décrivent la bibliographie citée importée pour cette publication. Les métriques de références citées utilisent le total des références citées comme dénominateur. Les métriques d’auteurices cité·es indiquent si elles utilisent toutes les occurrences d’auteurices cité·es ou seulement les occurrences rattachées à des auteurices déjà intégré·es à la base de données AutiHub. Ils utilisent les rattachements mis en cache entre les auteurices cité·es et les auteurices intégré·es à la base de données AutiHub. Dernier calcul : 16/08/2026 11:30.

Références citées
73
Nombre total de références citées intégrées pour cette publication.
Références citées avec un·e auteur·ice identifié·e comme autiste
10 / 73 (13,7 %)
Occurrences d’auteur·ices cité·es identifié·es comme autistes
15 / 149 (10,1 %)
Parmi les occurrences rattachées à des auteurices intégré·es à la base de données AutiHub : 15 / 47 (31,9 %). Auteurices cité·es distinct·es identifié·es comme autistes : 10 / 135 (7,4 %).
Occurrences citées rattachées à la base AutiHub
47 / 149 (31,5 %)
Auteurices cité·es distinct·es rattaché·es : 37 / 135 (27,4 %)
Occurrences rattachées, non identifiées comme autistes
32 / 47 (68,1 %)
Parmi les seules occurrences rattachées. Sur l’ensemble des occurrences d’auteurices cité·es : 32 / 149 (21,5 %). Auteurices cité·es distinct·es rattaché·es, non identifié·es comme autistes : 27 / 37 (73,0 %).
  1. Robert D. Orr , Norman Pang , Edmund D. Pellegrino , Mark Siegler (1997). Use of the Hippocratic Oath: A Review of Twentieth Century Practice and a Content Analysis of Oaths Administered in Medical Schools in the U.S. and Canada in 1993 . The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 8(4), 377-388. University of Chicago Press.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1086/jce199708409 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W23806694
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  2. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Psychological Association, Inc.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  3. Andrew F. Hayes , Jacob J. Coutts (2020). Use Omega Rather than Cronbach’s Alpha for Estimating Reliability. But… . Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1-24. Informa UK Limited.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W3005886336
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  4. (1982). The American Educational Research Association 1983 Annual Meeting . Educational Researcher, 11(9), 3-6. American Educational Research Association (AERA).
    Type: Article DOI: 10.3102/0013189x011009003 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W1481081965
    OpenAlex
  5. Thomas Armstrong (2012). Neurodiversity in the Classroom: Strength-Based Strategies to Help Students with Special Needs Succeed in School and Life .
    Type: Livre OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W1572442237
    Crossref OpenAlex
  7. D. Morin , M. Rivard , A. G. Crocker , C. P. Boursier , J. Caron (2013). Public attitudes towards intellectual disability: a multidimensional perspective . Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(3), 279-292. Wiley.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1111/jir.12008 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W1534100032
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  8. Tihomir Asparouhov , Bengt Muthén (2009). Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling . Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 397-438. Informa UK Limited.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1080/10705510903008204 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2040890982
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  9. Andrew Maul (2017). Rethinking Traditional Methods of Survey Validation . Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 15(2), 51-69. Informa UK Limited.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1080/15366367.2017.1348108 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2742736991
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  10. (s. d.). Bailin A. (2019, June 6). Clearing up some misconceptions about neurodiversity. Scientific American Blog Network. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/clearing-up-some-misconceptions-about-neurodiversity/
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  11. Jennifer E. F. Teitcher , Walter O. Bockting , José A. Bauermeister , Chris J. Hoefer , Michael H. Miner , Robert L. Klitzman (2015). Detecting, Preventing, and Responding to “Fraudsters” in Internet Research: Ethics and Tradeoffs . Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 43(1), 116-133. Cambridge University Press (CUP).
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12200 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2117633598
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  12. D. Morin , A. G. Crocker , R. Beaulieu‐Bergeron , J. Caron (2013). Validation of the attitudes toward intellectual disability – ATTID questionnaire . Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(3), 268-278. Wiley.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01559.x OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W1841798539
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  13. Ballou E. P. (2018). What the neurodiversity movement does—and doesn’t—offer. Thinking Person’s Guide to Autism. http://www.thinkingautismguide.com/2018/02/what-neurodiversity-movement-doesand.html
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  15. Mijke Rhemtulla , Patricia É. Brosseau-Liard , Victoria Savalei (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354-373. American Psychological Association (APA).
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1037/a0029315 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W1970325005
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  16. Ballou E. P. (2021). Sincerely, your autistic child: What people on the autism spectrum wish their parents knew about growing up, acceptance, and identity . Sincerely, your autistic child: What people on the autism spectrum wish their parents knew about growing up, acceptance, and identity.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  18. (s. d.). Bascom J. (2011, October 5). Quiet hands. Just stimming. https://juststimming.wordpress.com/category/autism/
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  19. Ella Perry , Will Mandy , Laura Hull , Eilidh Cage (2022). Understanding Camouflaging as a Response to Autism-Related Stigma: A Social Identity Theory Approach . Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52(2), 800-810. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1007/s10803-021-04987-w OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W3150043110
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  20. Li‐tze Hu , Peter M. Bentler (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives . Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. Informa UK Limited.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2071666535
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  21. Becker R. (2022). Gender and survey participation: An event history analysis of the gender effects of survey participation in a probability-based multi-wave panel study with a sequential mixed-mode design. Methods, Data, Analyses, 16(1), Article 30. https://doi.org/10 . 12758/mda. 2021. 08
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  22. Bridget Livingstone , Margaret F. Gibson , Patty Douglas , Sarah Leo , Julia Gruson-Wood (2023). Weighing In . International Journal of Disability and Social Justice, 3(3), 72. Pluto Journals.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.13169/intljofdissocjus.3.3.0072 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W4390072391
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  23. Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2020). Ethics code for behavior analysts. https://bacb.com/wp-content/ethics-code-for-behavior-analysts/
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  24. Anthony J. Goreczny , Erin E. Bender , Guy Caruso , Celia S. Feinstein (2011). Attitudes toward individuals with disabilities: Results of a recent survey and implications of those results . Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(5), 1596-1609. Elsevier BV.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.02.005 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2109192086
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  25. Bogardus E. S. (1933). bibr10-13623613241245756 Sociology & Social Research, 17, 265.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  26. Robert Chapman * (2020). Defining neurodiversity for research and practice . Dans Neurodiversity Studies (pp. 218-220). Routledge.
    Type: Chapitre de livre DOI: 10.4324/9780429322297-21 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W3034044232
    AutiHub · Chercheur·euses autistes Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  27. Robert Chapman * (2019). Neurodiversity Theory and Its Discontents: Autism, Schizophrenia, and the Social Model of Disability . Dans The Bloomsbury Companion to Philosophy of Psychiatry (pp. 371-390). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
    Type: Chapitre de livre DOI: 10.5040/9781350024090.ch-018 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2964791169
    AutiHub · Chercheur·euses autistes Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  28. Nassim Tabri , Corinna Marie Elliott (2012). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling . Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology, 1(1), 59-60. University of Waterloo.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.15353/cgjsc.v1i1.3787 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2118338381
    OpenAlex
  29. Liora Findler , Noa Vilchinsky , Shirli Werner (2007). The Multidimensional Attitudes Scale Toward Persons With Disabilities (MAS) . Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 50(3), 166-176. SAGE Publications.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1177/00343552070500030401 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2135133528
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  30. Burkhart R. (2019). Language of disability, language of disorder: An investigation of lived experiences and perspectives of individuals on the autism spectrum with respect to communicative interventions [Independent study thesis] . Language of disability, language of disorder: An investigation of lived experiences and perspectives of individuals on the autism spectrum with respect to communicative interventions [Independent study thesis].
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  31. Melissa G. Wolf , Elliott Ihm , Andrew Maul , Ann Taves (2021). Survey Item Validation . Dans The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion (pp. 612-624). Routledge.
    Type: Chapitre de livre DOI: 10.4324/9781003222491-43 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W4200446404
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  32. Deborah Marks (1997). Models of disability . Disability and Rehabilitation, 19(3), 85-91. Informa UK Limited.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.3109/09638289709166831 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2153355731
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  33. Eilidh Cage , Jessica Di Monaco , Victoria Newell (2018). Experiences of Autism Acceptance and Mental Health in Autistic Adults . Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(2), 473-484. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1007/s10803-017-3342-7 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2766434912
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  34. So Yoon Kim , Kristen Gillespie-Lynch (2023). Do Autistic People’s Support Needs and Non-Autistic People’s Support for the Neurodiversity Movement Contribute to Heightened Autism Stigma in South Korea vs. the US? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 53(11), 4199-4213. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1007/s10803-022-05739-0 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W4294904405
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  35. Herbert W. Marsh , Alexandre J.S. Morin , Philip D. Parker , Gurvinder Kaur (2014). Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling: An Integration of the Best Features of Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis . Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10(1), 85-110. Annual Reviews.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2155022159
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  36. California Teachers Association. (n.d.). Code of ethics. https://www.cta.org/about-us/code-of-ethics
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  37. Andrew L. Comrey , Howard B. Lee (2013). A First Course in Factor Analysis . Psychology Press.
    Type: Livre DOI: 10.4324/9781315827506 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2795656446
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  38. Jack Drescher (2015). Out of DSM: Depathologizing Homosexuality . Behavioral Sciences, 5(4), 565-575. MDPI AG.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.3390/bs5040565 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2183304066
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  39. Geraldine Leader , Cathal Abberton , Stephen Cunningham , Katie Gilmartin , Margo Grudzien , Emily Higgins et al. (2022). Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review . Nutrients, 14(7), 1471. MDPI AG.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.3390/nu14071471 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W4223632580
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  40. Sarah Mulholland (2016). ADHD-specific knowledge and attitudes of teachers (ASKAT): Development and validation of a new research instrument . International Journal of Educational Research, 77, 109-116. Elsevier BV.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2016.03.010 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2340532231
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  41. Robert Chapman * (2020). Neurodiversity, disability, wellbeing . Dans Neurodiversity Studies (pp. 57-72). Routledge.
    Type: Chapitre de livre DOI: 10.4324/9780429322297-7 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2966072789
    AutiHub · Chercheur·euses autistes Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  42. Daniel R. Eignor (2013). The standards for educational and psychological testing. Dans APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology, Vol. 1: Test theory and testing and assessment in industrial and organizational psychology. (pp. 245-250). American Psychological Association.
    Type: Chapitre de livre DOI: 10.1037/14047-013 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2490857485
    OpenAlex
  44. Lee Anna Clark , David Watson (2019). Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1412-1427. American Psychological Association (APA).
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1037/pas0000626 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2923413722
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  45. Cyrielle Derguy , Benoite Aubé , Odile Rohmer , Federica Marotta , Déborah Loyal (2021). Another step to school inclusion: Development and validation of the Children’s Attitudes Toward Autism Questionnaire . Autism, 25(6), 1666-1681. SAGE Publications.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1177/13623613211000163 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W3145572105
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  46. Crow L. (2010). Equality, participation and inclusion 1: Diverse perspectives . Equality, participation and inclusion 1: Diverse perspectives, 136.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  48. Ginny Russell (2020). Critiques of the Neurodiversity Movement . Dans Autistic Community and the Neurodiversity Movement (pp. 287-303). Springer Singapore.
    Type: Chapitre de livre DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-8437-0_21 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2986569042
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  49. Mark Wilson (2004). Constructing Measures . Routledge.
    Type: Livre DOI: 10.4324/9781410611697 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W4244055828
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  50. Allison P. Edwards , Barbara E. Hekel (2021). Appraisal of disability attitudes and curriculum of nursing students: a literature review . International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 18(1). Walter de Gruyter GmbH.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1515/ijnes-2021-0029 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W3178124694
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  51. Kinga Ferenc , Mateusz Płatos , Katarzyna Byrka , Magdalena Ewa Król (2023). Looking through rainbow-rimmed glasses: Taking neurodiversity perspective is related to subjective well-being of autistic adults . Autism, 27(5), 1348-1361. SAGE Publications.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1177/13623613221135818 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W4308957609
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  52. So Yoon Kim (2020). The Development and Pilot-Testing of the Autism Attitude Acceptance Scale: An Instrument Measuring Autism Acceptance . Autism in Adulthood, 2(3), 204-215. SAGE Publications.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1089/aut.2019.0066 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W3039680541
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  53. Fletcher-Watson S. (2018). Is early autism intervention compatible with neurodiversity? DART. https://dart.ed.ac.uk/intervention-neurodiversity/
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  54. Kristen Gillespie-Lynch , Jennifer B Bisson , Sabine Saade , Rita Obeid , Bella Kofner , Ashley Johnson Harrison et al. (2022). If you want to develop an effective autism training, ask autistic students to help you . Autism, 26(5), 1082-1094. SAGE Publications.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1177/13623613211041006 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W3198012637
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  55. Michelle Gonzalez (2021). Dyslexia knowledge, perceived preparedness, and professional development needs of in-service educators . Annals of Dyslexia, 71(3), 547-567. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1007/s11881-021-00235-z OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W3166496949
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  57. IBM Corp (2021). IBM SPSS statistics for Windows . IBM SPSS statistics for Windows.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  58. Rolf Becker (2022). Gender and Survey Participation An Event History Analysis of the Gender Effects of Survey Participation in a Probability-based Multi-wave Panel Study with a Sequential Mixed-mode Design . Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences), 29. GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.12758/mda.2021.08 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W3213550748
    OpenAlex
  59. Kline R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling . Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  60. Ari Ne'eman * , Elizabeth Pellicano (2022). Neurodiversity as Politics . Human Development, 66(2), 149-157. S. Karger AG.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1159/000524277 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W4221096330
    AutiHub · Chercheur·euses autistes Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  61. Lambert R. (2021). bibr40-13623613241245756 Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 23(3), 54.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  62. Muthén L. K. (2007). MPlus user’s guide . MPlus user’s guide.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  63. (s. d.). PROMIS®. (2013, May). PROMIS® instrument development and validation scientific standards version 2. 0. https://www.healthmeasures.net/images/PROMIS/PROMISStandards_Vers2 . 0_Final.pdf
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  64. (s. d.). Roberts J. (2020, August 13). On Writing Masking Goals for Autistic Middle School Girls—Stop It! Therapist Neurodiversity Collective. https://therapistndc.org/masking-goals-autistic-middle-school-girls/
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  65. Rosenberg M. J. (1960). Attitude organization and change . Attitude organization and change, 1.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  66. Schuck R. K. (2022). American Educational Research Association 2022 Annual Meeting . American Educational Research Association 2022 Annual Meeting.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  67. Sinclair J. (1993). Don’t mourn for us. Our Voice, 1(3). https://www.autreat.com/dont_mourn.html
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  68. Smith G. (2008). Does gender influence online survey participation? A record-linkage analysis of university faculty online survey response behavior (ERIC document reproduction service no. ED 501717). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED501717
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  69. Thinking Person’s Guide to Autism. (n.d.). Neurodiversity FAQ. https://thinkingautismguide.com/neurodiversity-faq
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  70. VanDaalen R. (2021). bibr64-13623613241245756 Development and validation of Neurodiversity Attitudes Scale [Doctoral dissertation].
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  71. (s. d.). Walker N. (2014, September 27). Neurodiversity: Some basic terms & definitions. https://neuroqueer.com/neurodiversity-terms-and-definitions/
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  72. Willis G. B. (2004). Cognitive interviews. Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design . Cognitive interviews. Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  73. Yarrish C. (2019). bibr69-13623613241245756 The Behavior Therapist, 42(7), 235.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref