L’impact du type de harcèlement et des caractéristiques démographiques, mais non d’un lien avec l’autisme, sur l’identification du harcèlement par les adultes

Titre original en anglais : The Impact of Bullying Type and Demographic Characteristics, but not an Autism Relationship, on Adults’ Identification of Bullying

Morton, H. E., Swinson, S., Mattson, R. E., Gillis, J. M., & Romanczyk, R. G. (2022). The Impact of Bullying Type and Demographic Characteristics, but not an Autism Relationship, on Adults’ Identification of Bullying [Preprint]. Center for Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hsy7z

Date de publication: 21/03/2022 Ajout dans AutiHub: 06/07/2026 Type: Prépublication Langue de l’article: Anglais

Cette publication est intégrée dans AutiHub via :

Auteurs

Auteur·ices des publications
5
Auteur·ices de la publication identifié·es comme autistes
1 / 5 (20,0 %)

Résumé

Les taux de prévalence du harcèlement varient considérablement et sont probablement influencés par l’interprétation que les adultes donnent des expériences des jeunes. Cette étude a examiné comment le type de harcèlement, l’âge de l’enfant et les caractéristiques démographiques des répondants influencent l’identification du harcèlement. Les participants étaient 588 adultes avec et sans liens avec l’autisme qui ont caractérisé des vignettes comme relevant du harcèlement verbal, physique, en ligne ou interpersonnel, ou comme ne relevant pas du harcèlement. L’identification des vignettes était plus exacte pour le harcèlement physique et moins exacte pour le harcèlement interpersonnel. L’identification du harcèlement dans les vignettes concernant l’âge du collège était plus faible comparativement aux autres âges. Le genre féminin et la race blanche des participants prédisaient une exactitude accrue ; aucun effet d’un lien avec l’autisme n’a été observé. Les chercheurs et les éducateurs devraient évaluer chaque type de harcèlement et considérer comment les caractéristiques de l’enfant et de l’observateur influencent les perceptions du harcèlement.

Prevalence rates for bullying vary widely and are likely impacted by adult interpretation of youths’ experiences. This study examined how bullying type, child age, and respondent demographics impact bullying identification. Participants were 588 adults with and without Autism relationships who characterized vignettes as verbal, physical, cyber, or interpersonal bullying or non-bullying. Vignette identification was more accurate for physical bullying and less accurate for interpersonal bullying. Bullying identification in middle school-age vignettes was lower compared to other ages. Participant female gender and White race predicted increased accuracy; there was no impact of an Autism relationship. Researchers and educators should assess for each bullying type and consider how child and observer characteristics impact bullying perceptions.

Bibliographie citée par cette référence

Les références citées sont importées depuis des sources externes de métadonnées lorsqu’elles sont disponibles. La liste peut être partielle.

Vue d’ensemble de l’inclusion dans la bibliographie

Ces indicateurs décrivent la bibliographie citée importée pour cette publication. Les métriques de références citées utilisent le total des références citées comme dénominateur. Les métriques d’auteurices cité·es indiquent si elles utilisent toutes les occurrences d’auteurices cité·es ou seulement les occurrences rattachées à des auteurices déjà intégré·es à la base de données AutiHub. Ils utilisent les rattachements mis en cache entre les auteurices cité·es et les auteurices intégré·es à la base de données AutiHub. Dernier calcul : 16/08/2026 11:31.

Références citées
55
Nombre total de références citées intégrées pour cette publication.
Références citées avec un·e auteur·ice identifié·e comme autiste
2 / 55 (3,6 %)
Occurrences d’auteur·ices cité·es identifié·es comme autistes
2 / 173 (1,2 %)
Parmi les occurrences rattachées à des auteurices intégré·es à la base de données AutiHub : 2 / 17 (11,8 %). Auteurices cité·es distinct·es identifié·es comme autistes : 1 / 162 (0,6 %).
Occurrences citées rattachées à la base AutiHub
17 / 173 (9,8 %)
Auteurices cité·es distinct·es rattaché·es : 14 / 162 (8,6 %)
Occurrences rattachées, non identifiées comme autistes
15 / 17 (88,2 %)
Parmi les seules occurrences rattachées. Sur l’ensemble des occurrences d’auteurices cité·es : 15 / 173 (8,7 %). Auteurices cité·es distinct·es rattaché·es, non identifié·es comme autistes : 13 / 14 (92,9 %).
  1. Stephen G. West , John F. Finch , Patrick J. Curran (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies.
    Type: Article OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W135304209
    OpenAlex
  2. Dan Olweus (2012). Revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire . PsycTESTS Dataset. American Psychological Association (APA).
    Type: Jeu de données DOI: 10.1037/t09634-000 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W193349933
    OpenAlex
  3. Philip C. Rodkin , Dorothy L. Espelage , Laura D. Hanish (2015). A relational framework for understanding bullying: Developmental antecedents and outcomes. American Psychologist, 70(4), 311-321. American Psychological Association (APA).
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1037/a0038658 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W311244873
    OpenAlex
  4. Rachel H. Gentry , Kerri L. Pickel , Meghan C. Johnson (2015). Evaluations of a bullying case involving a victim with autism spectrum disorder . Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(2), 67-79. Wiley.
    OpenAlex
  5. Dorothy L. Espelage , Susan M. Swearer (2003). Research on School Bullying and Victimization: What Have We Learned and Where Do We Go From Here? School Psychology Review, 32(3), 365-383. Informa UK Limited.
    OpenAlex
  6. Ersilia Menesini , Annalaura Nocentini (2009). Cyberbullying Definition and Measurement . Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 217(4), 230-232. Hogrefe Publishing Group.
    OpenAlex
  7. Catherine P. Bradshaw , Anne L. Sawyer , Lindsey M. O’Brennan (2007). Bullying and Peer Victimization at School: Perceptual Differences Between Students and School Staff . School Psychology Review, 36(3), 361-382. Informa UK Limited.
    OpenAlex
  8. Christophe Maïano , Claude L. Normand , Marie‐Claude Salvas , Grégory Moullec , Annie Aimé (2016). Prevalence of School Bullying Among Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis . Autism Research, 9(6), 601-615. Wiley.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1002/aur.1568 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W1942667353
    OpenAlex
  9. Anita Purcell (2012). A qualitative study of perceptions of bullying in Irish primary schools . Educational Psychology in Practice, 28(3), 273-285. Informa UK Limited.
    OpenAlex
  10. Paul R. Sterzing , Paul Shattuck , Sarah C. Narendorf , Mary Wagner , Benjamin P. Cooper (2012). Bullying Involvement and Autism Spectrum Disorders . Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 166(11), 1058. American Medical Association (AMA).
    OpenAlex
  11. Paul Naylor , Helen Cowie , Fabienne Cossin , Rita de Bettencourt , Francesca Lemme (2006). Teachers' and pupils' definitions of bullying . British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 553-576. Wiley.
    OpenAlex
  12. Peter J. Rousseeuw (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis . Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53-65. Elsevier BV.
    OpenAlex
  13. George G. Bear , Lindsey S. Mantz , Joseph J. Glutting , Chunyan Yang , Deborah E. Boyer (2015). Differences in Bullying Victimization Between Students With and Without Disabilities . School Psychology Review, 44(1), 98-116. Informa UK Limited.
    OpenAlex
  14. Sheri Bauman , Adrienne Del Rio (2006). Preservice teachers' responses to bullying scenarios: Comparing physical, verbal, and relational bullying. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 219-231. American Psychological Association (APA).
    OpenAlex
  15. Susan Harcourt , Marieke Jasperse , Vanessa A. Green (2014). “We were Sad and We were Angry”: A Systematic Review of Parents’ Perspectives on Bullying . Child & Youth Care Forum, 43(3), 373-391. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    OpenAlex
  16. Justin Canty , Maria Stubbe , Denise Steers , Sunny Collings (2016). The Trouble with Bullying – Deconstructing the Conventional Definition of Bullying for a Child‐centred Investigation into Children's Use of Social Media . Children & Society, 30(1), 48-58. Wiley.
    OpenAlex
  17. Cristan A. Farmer , Michael G. Aman (2009). Development of the Children's Scale of Hostility and Aggression: Reactive/Proactive (C-SHARP) . Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30(6), 1155-1167. Elsevier BV.
    OpenAlex
  18. Shannon A. Johnson , Jillian H. Filliter , Robin R. Murphy (2009). Discrepancies Between Self- and Parent-Perceptions of Autistic Traits and Empathy in High Functioning Children and Adolescents on the Autism Spectrum . Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(12), 1706-1714. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    OpenAlex
  19. Vicki Bitsika , Christopher F. Sharpley (2014). Understanding, Experiences, and Reactions to Bullying Experiences in Boys with an Autism Spectrum Disorder . Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26(6), 747-761. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    OpenAlex
  20. Benedetta Emanuela Palladino , Annalaura Nocentini , Ersilia Menesini (2015). Psychometric Properties of the Florence CyberBullying-CyberVictimization Scales . Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(2), 112-119. SAGE Publications.
    OpenAlex
  21. David Schwartz , Jennifer E. Lansford , Kenneth A. Dodge , Gregory S. Pettit , John E. Bates (2015). Peer Victimization During Middle Childhood as a Lead Indicator of Internalizing Problems and Diagnostic Outcomes in Late Adolescence . Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44(3), 393-404. Informa UK Limited.
    OpenAlex
  22. Melissa A. Sreckovic , Nelson C. Brunsting , Harriet Able (2014). Victimization of students with autism spectrum disorder: A review of prevalence and risk factors . Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(9), 1155-1172. Elsevier BV.
    OpenAlex
  23. Adrian E. Raftery (1995). Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research . Sociological Methodology, 25, 111. JSTOR.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.2307/271063 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2089763487
    OpenAlex
  24. Jamilia J. Blake , Emily M. Lund , Qiong Zhou , Oi-man Kwok , Michael R. Benz (2012). National prevalence rates of bully victimization among students with disabilities in the United States. School Psychology Quarterly, 27(4), 210-222. American Psychological Association (APA).
    OpenAlex
  25. Robert S. Tokunaga (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization . Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 277-287. Elsevier BV.
    OpenAlex
  26. Faye Mishna , Debra Pepler , Judith Wiener (2006). Factors Associated With Perceptions and Responses to Bullying Situations by Children, Parents, Teachers, and Principals . Victims & Offenders, 1(3), 255-288. Informa UK Limited.
    OpenAlex
  27. William E. Copeland , Dieter Wolke , Adrian Angold , E. Jane Costello (2013). Adult Psychiatric Outcomes of Bullying and Being Bullied by Peers in Childhood and Adolescence . JAMA Psychiatry, 70(4), 419. American Medical Association (AMA).
    OpenAlex
  28. Pei-Yu Chen , Ilene S. Schwartz (2012). Bullying and Victimization Experiences of Students With Autism Spectrum Disorders in Elementary Schools . Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 27(4), 200-212. SAGE Publications.
    OpenAlex
  29. Anne L. Sawyer , Catherine P. Bradshaw , Lindsey M. O'Brennan (2008). Examining Ethnic, Gender, and Developmental Differences in the Way Children Report Being a Victim of “Bullying” on Self-Report Measures . Journal of Adolescent Health, 43(2), 106-114. Elsevier BV.
    OpenAlex
  30. Rachel E. Maunder , Alex Harrop , Andrew J. Tattersall (2010). Pupil and staff perceptions of bullying in secondary schools: comparing behavioural definitions and their perceived seriousness . Educational Research, 52(3), 263-282. Informa UK Limited.
    OpenAlex
  31. Mitchell J. Prinstein , Julie Boergers , Eric M. Vernberg (2001). Overt and Relational Aggression in Adolescents: Social-Psychological Adjustment of Aggressors and Victims . Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 30(4), 479-491. Informa UK Limited.
    OpenAlex
  32. Ken Kelley , Kristopher J. Preacher (2012). On effect size. Psychological Methods, 17(2), 137-152. American Psychological Association (APA).
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1037/a0028086 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2154516913
    OpenAlex
  33. Catherine P. Bradshaw , Tracy Evian Waasdorp , Sarah Lindstrom Johnson (2015). Overlapping Verbal, Relational, Physical, and Electronic Forms of Bullying in Adolescence: Influence of School Context . Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44(3), 494-508. Informa UK Limited.
    OpenAlex
  34. Izabela Zych , Rosario Ortega-Ruiz , Rosario Del Rey (2015). Systematic review of theoretical studies on bullying and cyberbullying: Facts, knowledge, prevention, and intervention . Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 1-21. Elsevier BV.
    OpenAlex
  35. Francis L. Huang , Dewey G. Cornell (2016). Question Order Affects the Measurement of Bullying Victimization Among Middle School Students . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(5), 724-740. SAGE Publications.
    OpenAlex
  36. Thomas Farmer , Traci L. Wike , Quentin R. Alexander , Philip C. Rodkin , Meera Mehtaji (2015). Students With Disabilities and Involvement in Peer Victimization . Remedial and Special Education, 36(5), 263-274. SAGE Publications.
    OpenAlex
  37. Judith Hebron , Jeremy Oldfield , Neil Humphrey (2017). Cumulative risk effects in the bullying of children and young people with autism spectrum conditions . Autism, 21(3), 291-300. SAGE Publications.
    OpenAlex
  38. Erin E Cook , Amanda B Nickerson , Jilynn M Werth , Kathleen P Allen (2017). Service providers’ perceptions of and responses to bullying of individuals with disabilities . Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 21(4), 277-296. SAGE Publications.
    OpenAlex
  39. Wendy Troop‐Gordon (2017). Peer victimization in adolescence: The nature, progression, and consequences of being bullied within a developmental context ☆ . Journal of Adolescence, 55(1), 116-128. Wiley.
    OpenAlex
  40. Paul H. P. Hanel , Katia C. Vione (2016). Do Student Samples Provide an Accurate Estimate of the General Public? PLOS ONE, 11(12), e0168354. Public Library of Science (PLoS).
    OpenAlex
  41. Sarah VanZoeren , Arlene N. Weisz (2018). Teachers’ Perceived Likelihood of Intervening in Bullying Situations: Individual Characteristics and Institutional Environments . Journal of School Violence, 17(2), 258-269. Informa UK Limited.
    OpenAlex
  42. Jennifer L. Doty , Amy L. Gower , Jessie H. Rudi , Barbara J. McMorris , Iris W. Borowsky (2017). Patterns of Bullying and Sexual Harassment: Connections with Parents and Teachers as Direct Protective Factors . Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(11), 2289-2304. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    OpenAlex
  43. Tianjian Lai , Grace Kao (2018). Hit, Robbed, and Put Down (but not Bullied): Underreporting of Bullying by Minority and Male Students . Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(3), 619-635. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    OpenAlex
  44. A. Kavanagh , N. Priest , E. Emerson , A. Milner , T. King (2018). Gender, parental education, and experiences of bullying victimization by Australian adolescents with and without a disability . Child: Care, Health and Development, 44(2), 332-341. Wiley.
    OpenAlex
  45. Jill Ashburner , Beth Saggers , Marilyn A. Campbell , Julie A. Dillon‐Wallace , Yoon‐Suk Hwang , Suzanne Carrington et al. (2019). How are students on the autism spectrum affected by bullying? Perspectives of students and parents . Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 19(1), 27-44. Wiley.
    OpenAlex
  46. Mary Jia , Amori Mikami (2018). Issues in the assessment of bullying: Implications for conceptualizations and future directions . Aggression and Violent Behavior, 41, 108-118. Elsevier BV.
    OpenAlex
  47. Jason D. Rights , Sonya K. Sterba (2019). Quantifying explained variance in multilevel models: An integrative framework for defining R-squared measures. Psychological Methods, 24(3), 309-338. American Psychological Association (APA).
    OpenAlex
  48. Nadine M. Connell , Natalie M. Schell-Busey , Richard Hernandez (2019). Experiences Versus Perceptions: Do Students Agree That They Have Been Bullied? Youth & Society, 51(3), 394-416. SAGE Publications.
    OpenAlex
  49. Marilyn Campbell , Chrystal Whiteford , Johanna Hooijer (2019). Teachers’ and parents’ understanding of traditional and cyberbullying . Journal of School Violence, 18(3), 388-402. Informa UK Limited.
    OpenAlex
  50. Jette Kofoed , Elisabeth Staksrud (2019). ‘We always torment different people, so by definition, we are no bullies’: The problem of definitions in cyberbullying research . New Media & Society, 21(4), 1006-1020. SAGE Publications.
    OpenAlex
  51. Chad A Rose , Lisa E Monda-Amaya , June L Preast (2018). Pre-service Special and General Educators’ Perceptions of Bullying . Exceptionality Education International, 28(2). University of Western Ontario, Western Libraries.
    OpenAlex
  52. Elise Øksendal , Ragnhild Eek Brandlistuen , Arne Holte , Mari Vaage Wang (2019). Peer-Victimization of Young Children With Developmental and Behavioral Difficulties—A Population-Based Study . Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 44(5), 589-600. Oxford University Press (OUP).
    OpenAlex
  53. Rachel Holden , Joanne Mueller , John McGowan , Jyoti Sanyal , Maxim Kikoler , Emily Simonoff et al. (2020). Investigating Bullying as a Predictor of Suicidality in a Clinical Sample of Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder . Autism Research, 13(6), 988-997. Wiley.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1002/aur.2292 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W3012826993
    OpenAlex