A critical reflection on definitions of autistic well‐being

This publication is included in the Autistic Autism Scholarship Project. one author of this publication is identified as autistic in the project.

About the autistic author marker

Deakin, M., Petty, S., Heasman, B., & Hamilton, L. G. (2024). A critical reflection on definitions of autistic well‐being. Brain and Behavior, 14(7), e3572-e3572. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3572

Publication date: 30 Jun 2024 Added to AutiHub: 30 Aug 2026 Type: Article Article language: English

This publication is integrated into AutiHub through:

Authors

Publication authors
4
Publication authors identified as autistic
1 / 4 (25.0%)

Abstract

Our ongoing systematic literature review of psychological well-being interventions for autistic adults highlighted that the concept of well-being has been poorly operationalized for autistic people in clinical literature. Our investigation aims to contribute a novel review of how well psychological well-being interventions are designed for autistic adults. While assumptions around the definition of autism have been critiqued extensively in literature (Heasman & Parfitt, 2023) our review of 69 studies found that the concept of “well-being”, as it applies to autistic people, has received comparatively little attention. We raise three issues with the current oversimplification of well-being when it is understood as a return to “normal” functioning through the remediation of ill-being. We suggest that a way forward is to embrace contemporary theorizing of both being autistic (Chapman, 2021; Kourti, 2021) and of experiencing wellness vulnerabilities (van Os et al., 2019). A review of what is meant by autistic well-being would inform clinical and research practices. In our review we have found that representations of well-being of autistic people were diverse; however, they lacked critical evaluation. Well-being was operationalized as a wide range of outcomes, such as a reduction in anxious thoughts (Langdon et al., 2016), or an increase in social relating (Oswald et al., 2018). Some studies measured changes in multiple domains, such as stress, anxiety, depression and quality of life (Pahnke et al., 2019). Importantly, many authors either (a) commented that the outcome measures used to demonstrate the effectiveness of a therapeutic intervention were not designed for autistic people or (b) did not specify how the measures would be appropriate for use with autistic people. This lack of criticality can lead to misinterpretations (Stewart et al., 2006). For example, an autistic person might reduce social demands temporarily as a way to improve their well-being, rather than this being a reflection of ill-being (Pearson & Rose, 2021). This highlights how autistic people have described their distress being misunderstood in clinical practice (Au-Yeung et al., 2019; Babb et al., 2021), emphasizing the need to hear lived experiences over default definitions. Systematic reviews have identified wide variability in the reported rates of anxiety, depression and suicide ideation for autistic people (Cassidy et al., 2018; Hollocks et al., 2019; Wigham et al., 2017). For example, one review identified that rates of depression reported for autistic people without cognitive impairment varied from 1% to 47% (Wigham et al., 2017). Potential reasons for this variation include the lack of definitive conceptualizations of depression for autistic people, as well as uncertain validity of the outcome measures used. One response to these concerns has been to develop measures designed with and for autistic adults, for example the Anxiety Scale for Autism—Adults (Rodgers et al., 2020). Together, these findings show the need for a stable definition of “autistic well-being” to aid further development of appropriate tools for research and clinical practice. The experience of well-being may be different for autistic people compared with their non-autistic peers, but measures of autistic well-being are often based on normative models (Ayres et al., 2018; Lam et al., 2021). Assuming that being well means being “typical” is counterproductive (Milton & Sims, 2016). Current guidance tells practitioners to follow established therapeutic intervention protocols for the general population, and to tailor these for autistic people (NICE, 2021; Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, 2016). A critical review of the conceptualization of autistic well-being will open up research possibilities. Many studies featured in our ongoing review were exploratory pilot or feasibility studies, reflecting the early development of research in this area. Developing work is considering concepts of marginalization and societal justice more broadly (Petty, Hamilton et al., 2023). There are associated implications for individual well-being, including an autistic person's sense of belonging (Milton & Sims, 2016; Sonuga-Barke, 2023). To direct future research, it is helpful to note that the challenge of identifying a stable definition of well-being is not limited to autistic people. Dodge et al. (2012) defined well-being as “the balance point between an individual's resource pool and the challenges faced, where resources and challenges can be psychological, social and physical,” (p. 230). However, well-being is more than an absence of illness or negative stressors (Dodge et al., 2012; Waters et al., 2009). The idea that ill-being inevitably stems from being autistic needs to be challenged; instead ill-being stems from a combination of external and internal factors (Chapman, 2020). A revised understanding of autistic well-being will need to consider elements often missed from definitions created for a neurotypical majority, including sensory processing differences (Milton & Sims, 2016; Petty, Lambarth et al., 2023; Robeyns, 2016). Sensory processing is a dimension of well-being that can help understand pain and fatigue for autistic people (Robeyns, 2016). A scale of overwhelm or fatigue may offer a better metric of emotional distress than standardized tools assessing anxiety or depression (Petty, Lambarth et al., 2023). A stronger conceptualization of autistic well-being requires a theoretical rationale about what well-being is, and a nuanced approach to how this interacts with characteristics of being autistic, intersectional complexities, and support needs. This conceptualization would appreciate how well-being is situated within societal and structural environments that may support or limit well-being capabilities (Lam et al., 2021; Robeyns, 2016). Importantly, the potential to flourish also needs to be recognized. Chapman and Carel (2022) write about the implications of epistemic injustice that denies autistic flourishing, and can mislead some autistic individuals’ attempts to thrive. We recommend a way of conceptualizing well-being to underpin meaningful measures that fairly represent autistic people's various diverse experiences, rather than “adding to” concepts developed for the general population. Contemporary theorizing provides the opportunity to refocus the purpose of therapeutic interventions, disentangle the need to reduce problematic “symptoms” alone, and promote thriving (Sonuga-Barke, 2023; van Os et al., 2019). Our mixed-methods review had deliberately broad inclusion criteria for psychological interventions, outcomes and study designs. Yet the studies reviewed predominantly focused on reducing symptoms of ill-being. Alternatively, mental health can be conceptualized as a person's vulnerabilities, within a resilience-building approach that would strengthen social and existential domains (van Os et al., 2019). Having a positive autistic social identity appears to offer a protective mechanism for psychological well-being through improved personal and collective self-esteem (Cooper et al., 2017). In conclusion, we recommend that the ontological reframing of autism flows through into clinical practice. We suggest that emerging research into therapeutic interventions for autistic people foregrounds a valid well-being definition and personally important lifespan outcomes, without comparison with a neuromajority default. This approach would align with a neurodiversity paradigm model for translational science (Sonuga-Barke, 2023). The authors have clinical and research experience of working with autistic clients, and align with a neurodiversity approach that values differences (Dwyer, 2022). They are not diagnosed as autistic. Michele Deakin: Conceptualization; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. Stephanie Petty: Conceptualization; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. Brett Heasman: Conceptualization; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. Lorna G Hamilton: Conceptualization; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1002/brb3.3572. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Bibliography cited by this reference

Cited references are imported from external metadata sources when they are available. The list may be partial.

Cited bibliography overview

These indicators describe the bibliography cited by this publication. An author name is counted each time it appears in one cited reference, so the same person can be counted more than once. Names not yet linked to an author already present in AutiHub are treated as unknown, not as non-autistic. Last computed: 12 Sep 2026 17:34.

Cited references
31
With a DOI
28
Without a DOI, from raw bibliography text
3
9 / 31 (29.0%) cited references include at least one author identified as autistic.
References with data to complete
2 / 31 (6.5%)
References with detected author names
29 / 31 (93.5%)
Without detected author names
2
Without a structured title
2
Without a stable identifier
3
References with raw author names still to review
2
References with external metadata lookup issues
0
These indicators apply to cited references displayed on this page, after technical duplicates have been merged. A reference without a DOI can still support author statistics when a title and author names are available.
Author names detected in the cited bibliography
115
From DOI or external metadata
115
From validated raw bibliography text
0
Raw names already validated
0
Raw names still to review
2
53 / 115 (46.1%) names are linked to an author already present in AutiHub. 62 / 115 (53.9%) names are not yet linked.
Names linked to a person identified as autistic
10 / 115 (8.7%)
Calculated across all author names detected in the cited bibliography. Among names linked to an author already present in AutiHub: 10 / 53 (18.9%). Distinct people identified as autistic: 7 / 101 (6.9%).
  1. ELIZABETH WATERS , ELISE DAVIS , GABRIEL M RONEN , PETER ROSENBAUM , MICHAEL LIVINGSTON , SAROJ SAIGAL (2009). Quality of life instruments for children and adolescents with neurodisabilities: how to choose the appropriate instrument . Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 51(8), 660-669. Wiley.
    Crossref OpenAlex
  2. Sheena K. Au‐Yeung , Louise Bradley , Ashley Robertson , Rebecca Shaw , Simon Baron-Cohen , Sarah Cassidy (2019). Experience of mental health diagnosis and perceived misdiagnosis in autistic, possibly autistic and non-autistic adults . Autism, 23(6), 1508-1518. SAGE Publications.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  3. Mary E. Stewart , Louise Barnard , Joanne Pearson , Reem Hasan , Gregory O’Brien (2006). Presentation of depression in autism and Asperger syndrome . Autism, 10(1), 103-116. SAGE Publications.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  4. Michael Ayres , Jeremy R Parr , Jacqui Rodgers , David Mason , Leah Avery , Darren Flynn (2018). A systematic review of quality of life of adults on the autism spectrum . Autism, 22(7), 774-783. SAGE Publications.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  5. Jim van Os , Sinan Guloksuz , Thomas Willem Vijn , Anton Hafkenscheid , Philippe Delespaul (2019). The evidence‐based group‐level symptom‐reduction model as the organizing principle for mental health care: time for change? World Psychiatry, 18(1), 88-96. Wiley.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  6. Peter E. Langdon , Glynis Murphy , Lee Shepstone , Edward C.F. Wilson , David Fowler , David Heavens et al. (2016). The People with Asperger syndrome and anxiety disorders (PAsSA) trial: a pilot multicentre, single-blind randomised trial of group cognitive–behavioural therapy . BJPsych Open, 2(2), 179-186. Royal College of Psychiatrists.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  7. Charli Babb , Janina Brede , Catherine R G Jones , Mair Elliott , Cathy Zanker , Kate Tchanturia et al. (2021). ‘It’s not that they don’t want to access the support... it’s the impact of the autism’: The experience of eating disorder services from the perspective of autistic women, parents and healthcare professionals . Autism, 25(5), 1409-1421. SAGE Publications.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  8. Ingrid Robeyns (2016). Conceptualising well-being for autistic persons . Journal of Medical Ethics, 42(6), 383-390. BMJ.
    Crossref OpenAlex
  9. Sarah Cassidy , L. Bradley , E. Bowen , Sarah Wigham , Jacqui Rodgers (2018). Measurement properties of tools used to assess depression in adults with and without autism spectrum conditions: A systematic review . Autism Research, 11(5), 738-754. Wiley.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1002/aur.1922 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2783826777
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  10. Robert Chapman *Autistic author. Learn more… (2021). Neurodiversity and the Social Ecology of Mental Functions . Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1360-1372. SAGE Publications.
    AutiHub · Autistic Autism Scholarship Project Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  11. Robert Chapman *Autistic author. Learn more… (2020). Neurodiversity, disability, wellbeing . In Neurodiversity studies: a new critical paradigm (pp. 57-72). Routledge.
    Type: Book chapter DOI: 10.4324/9780429322297-7 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2966072789
    AutiHub · Autistic Autism Scholarship Project Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  12. Matthew Hollocks , Jian Wei Lerh , Iliana Magiati , Richard Meiser-Stedman , Traolach Brugha (2019). Anxiety and depression in adults with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Psychological Medicine, 49(4), 559-572. Cambridge University Press (CUP).
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  13. Kate Cooper , Laura G. E. Smith , Ailsa Russell (2017). Social identity, self‐esteem, and mental health in autism . European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(7), 844-854. Wiley.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  14. Sarah Wigham , Stephen Barton , Jeremy R Parr , Jacqui Rodgers (2017). A Systematic Review of the Rates of Depression in Children and Adults With High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder . Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 10(4), 267-287. Informa UK Limited.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  15. Tasha M. Oswald , Breanna Winder-Patel , Steven Ruder , Guibo Xing , Aubyn C. Stahmer , Marjorie Solomon (2018). A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of the ACCESS Program: A Group Intervention to Improve Social, Adaptive Functioning, Stress Coping, and Self-Determination Outcomes in Young Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder . Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(5), 1742-1760. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Crossref OpenAlex
  16. Rachel Dodge , Annette Daly , Jan Huyton , Lalage Sanders (2012). The challenge of defining wellbeing . International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(3), 222-235. International Journal of Wellbeing.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  17. Edmund J. S. Sonuga‐Barke (2023). Paradigm ‘flipping’ to reinvigorate translational science: Outlining a neurodevelopmental science framework from a ‘neurodiversity’ perspective . Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 64(10), 1405-1408. Wiley.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  18. Johan Pahnke , Tatja Hirvikoski , Johan Bjureberg , Sven Bölte , Jussi Jokinen , Benjamin Bohman et al. (2019). Acceptance and commitment therapy for autistic adults: An open pilot study in a psychiatric outpatient context . Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 13, 34-41. Elsevier BV.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  19. Gary Yu Hin Lam , Sujay Sabnis , Maria Migueliz Valcarlos , Jennifer R. Wolgemuth (2021). A Critical Review of Academic Literature Constructing Well-Being in Autistic Adults . Autism in Adulthood, 3(1), 61-71. SAGE Publications.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  20. Jacqui Rodgers , Kirstin Farquhar , David Mason , Samuel Brice , Sarah Wigham , Barry Ingham et al. (2020). Development and Initial Evaluation of the Anxiety Scale for Autism-Adults . Autism in Adulthood, 2(1), 24-33. SAGE Publications.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  21. NICE. (2021). Autism. Recognition referral diagnosis and management of adults on the autism spectrum National Clinical Guideline Number 142. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg142/chapter/Research‐recommendations
    Type: Other
    Crossref
  22. Petty S. (2023). The SAGE handbook of social justice in the psychological therapies . The SAGE handbook of social justice in the psychological therapies.
    Type: Other
    Crossref
  23. S. Petty , Shauna Lambarth , L. G. Hamilton (2025). Rethinking anxiety and depression for autistic adults through personal narratives: A mixed‐method analysis of blog data . Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 25(1). Wiley.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  24. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. (2016). Assessment diagnosis and interventions for autism spectrum disorders A national clinical guideline. SIGN publication no. 145.
    Type: Other
    Crossref