Measuring the Wrong Thing the Right Way? Time to Rethink Autism Research Tools

This publication is included in the Autistic Autism Scholarship Project. one author of this publication is identified as autistic in the project.

About the autistic author marker

Jones, S. C. (2022). Measuring the Wrong Thing the Right Way? Time to Rethink Autism Research Tools. Autism in Adulthood, 4(2), 104-109. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0050

Publication date: 14 Mar 2022 Added to AutiHub: 6 Jul 2026 Type: Article Article language: English

This publication is integrated into AutiHub through:

Authors

Publication authors
1
Publication authors identified as autistic
1 / 1 (100.0%)

Abstract

Awareness and understanding of autism are increasing, sometimes in small incremental steps and sometimes through paradigm shifts. Much of this is driven by autistic advocates, whose voices are increasingly recognized as experts in their own lived experiences. The growing presence of autistic people in autism research—as participants, advisors, and (co)researchers—has brought about changes in the quality and relevance of autism research. We are seeing more studies by autistic autism researchers, more studies on issues of importance to autistic people, and more studies utilizing methodologies that resonate with autistic people. However, there remains a reliance on measures that are technically “valid” and “reliable” rather than relevant. As long as this is the case, we will continue to see studies published that “explain autism” in ways that do not reflect autistic experiences. Autism research is still making incremental changes and it is time for a paradigm shift. Community brief “Why is this topic important?” Research into the experiences of autistic people is used to inform policy, practice, and community understanding. It is important that autism research respects and reflects autistic voices. Current research often uses scientific instruments that are not consistent with our lived experience of autism. “What is the purpose of this article?” This article explains why the current approach to research—encouraging the use of existing measures and incremental change—is harmful to autism research and to autistic people. It provides examples of commonly used tools and explains why they are problematic. The article aims at encouraging a discussion into why the findings of autism research are often inconsistent with the experiences of autistic people. “What personal or professional perspectives do the authors bring to this topic?” I am an autistic adult, the mother of two autistic adults and an autism advocate. I am also an autism researcher with a background in public health and communication. “What is already known about this topic?” Academic journals aim at publishing papers that present the best and most accurate research projects. Researchers are encouraged to use tools that have been developed and tested in previous studies, because these are considered to be “reliable” (consistent) and “valid” (accurate). Researchers are discouraged from developing new measures or making major changes to existing ones. So, it can be hard to publish community-driven research that uses tools developed by autistic people. “What do the authors recommend?” I recommend that autism researchers ensure that the tools they use to study autism actually measure the experiences of autistic people. I also recommend that we stop relying on existing measures that do not make sense to autistic people and work with autistic people to develop better tools. “How will these recommendations help autistic adults now or in the future?” These recommendations will help autistic adults by making autism research more relevant and useful. Research that reflects our actual experiences will improve community understanding of autism. It will also lead to better policies and practices that meet the needs and aspirations of autistic people.

Bibliography cited by this reference

Cited references are imported from external metadata sources when they are available. The list may be partial.

Cited bibliography overview

These indicators describe the bibliography cited by this publication. An author name is counted each time it appears in one cited reference, so the same person can be counted more than once. Names not yet linked to an author already present in AutiHub are treated as unknown, not as non-autistic. Last computed: 2 Oct 2026 01:35.

Cited references
20
With a DOI
19
Without a DOI, from raw bibliography text
1
4 / 20 (20.0%) cited references include at least one author identified as autistic.
References with data to complete
1 / 20 (5.0%)
References with detected author names
20 / 20 (100.0%)
Without detected author names
0
Without a structured title
1
Without a stable identifier
1
References with raw author names still to review
0
References with external metadata lookup issues
0
These indicators apply to cited references displayed on this page, after technical duplicates have been merged. A reference without a DOI can still support author statistics when a title and author names are available.
Author names detected in the cited bibliography
76
From DOI or external metadata
76
From validated raw bibliography text
0
Raw names already validated
0
Raw names still to review
0
39 / 76 (51.3%) names are linked to an author already present in AutiHub. 37 / 76 (48.7%) names are not yet linked.
Names linked to a person identified as autistic
7 / 76 (9.2%)
Calculated across all author names detected in the cited bibliography. Among names linked to an author already present in AutiHub: 7 / 39 (17.9%). Distinct people identified as autistic: 7 / 74 (9.5%).
  1. Luci N. Flood , Amanda Bulgrin , Betsy L. Morgan (2013). Piecing together the puzzle: development of the Societal Attitudes towards Autism (SATA) scale . Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 13(2), 121-128. Wiley.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  2. Jennifer Sarrett (2017). Interviews, Disclosures, and Misperceptions: Autistic Adults' Perspectives on Employment Related Challenges . Disability Studies Quarterly, 37(2). The Ohio State University Libraries.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  3. Rebecca Kuzminski , Julie Netto , Joel Wilson , Torbjorn Falkmer , Angela Chamberlain , Marita Falkmer (2019). Linking knowledge and attitudes: Determining neurotypical knowledge about and attitudes towards autism . PLOS ONE, 14(7), e0220197. Public Library of Science (PLoS).
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  4. Hui Min Low , Lay Wah Lee , Aznan Che Ahmad (2020). Knowledge and Attitudes of Special Education Teachers Towards the Inclusion of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder . International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 67(5), 497-514. Informa UK Limited.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  5. Jolynn L. Haney , Jennifer A. Cullen (2018). An exploratory investigation of social workers’ knowledge and attitudes about autism . Social Work in Mental Health, 16(2), 201-222. Informa UK Limited.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  6. Sarah Cassidy , Louise Bradley , Heather Cogger-Ward , Jacqui Rodgers (2021). Development and validation of the suicidal behaviours questionnaire - autism spectrum conditions in a community sample of autistic, possibly autistic and non-autistic adults . Molecular Autism, 12(1), 1. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  7. Sarah L. Barrett , Mirko Uljarevic , Catherine RG Jones , Susan Leekam (2018). Assessing subtypes of restricted and repetitive behaviour using the Adult Repetitive Behaviour Questionnaire-2 in autistic adults . Molecular Autism, 9(1), 58. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  8. Ross Cooper , Craig Kennady (2021). Autistic voices from the workplace . Advances in Autism, 7(1), 73-85. Emerald.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  9. Cheryl L. Dickter , Joshua A. Burk , Janice L. Zeman , Sara Taylor (2020). Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward Autistic Adults . Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 144-151. SAGE Publications.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  10. Einar B. Thorsteinsson , Anja Draper , Amy D. Lykins (2020). To Vaccinate or Not: The Relative Impact of Attitudes toward Autism Spectrum Disorders and the Ability to Interpret Scientific Information on Vaccination Decisions . International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2542. MDPI AG.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  11. Jonathan S Beck , Rebecca A Lundwall , Terisa P. Gabrielsen , Jonathan C Cox , Mikle South (2020). Looking good but feeling bad: “Camouflaging” behaviors and mental health in women with autistic traits . Autism, 24(4), 809-821. SAGE Publications.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  12. Benoite Aubé , Alice Follenfant , Sébastien Goudeau , Cyrielle Derguy (2021). Public Stigma of Autism Spectrum Disorder at School: Implicit Attitudes Matter . Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51(5), 1584-1597. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  13. Monique Botha *Autistic author. Learn more… , Bridget Dibb , David M. Frost (2020). "Autism is me": An investigation of how autistic individuals make sense of autism and stigma. Center for Open Science.
    Crossref
  14. González Moreno, Andrés Santiago (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders . American Psychiatric Association.
    Crossref
  15. Kate Cooper , Ailsa Russell , Steph Calley , Huilin Chen , Jaxon Kramer , Bas Verplanken (2022). Cognitive processes in autism: Repetitive thinking in autistic versus non-autistic adults . Autism, 26(4), 849-858. SAGE Publications.
    Crossref OpenAlex
  16. Louise Bradley , Rebecca Shaw , Simon Baron-Cohen , Sarah Cassidy (2021). Autistic Adults' Experiences of Camouflaging and Its Perceived Impact on Mental Health . Autism in Adulthood, 3(4), 320-329. SAGE Publications.
    OpenAlex
  17. Bradley L (2020). Bradley L,, Shaw R,, Baron-Cohen S, et al. Autistic adults' experiences of camouflaging and its perceived impact on mental health. Autism Adulthood. 2020. https://doi.org/10 . 1089/aut. 2020. 0071. Autism Adulthood.
    Type: Other
    Crossref