Récompenser la transparence de la recherche

Titre original en anglais : Rewarding Research Transparency

Sources de métadonnées utilisées pour cette référence

OpenAlex Crossref PubMed OpenCitations
En savoir plus sur les sources utilisées

Gernsbacher, M. A. (2018). Rewarding Research Transparency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(11), 953-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.07.002

Date de publication: 23/07/2018 Ajout dans AutiHub: 18/07/2026 Type: Article Langue de l’article: Anglais
Source OpenAlex Source éditeur (DOI)

Cette publication est intégrée dans AutiHub via :

Auteurs

Auteur·ices des publications
1
Auteur·ices de la publication identifié·es comme autistes
0 / 1 (0,0 %)
  1. Morton Ann Gernsbacher

Résumé

Les scientifiques cognitifs sont de plus en plus enthousiastes à l'égard de la transparence de la recherche. Toutefois, leur enthousiasme pourrait être tempéré si le système de récompense de la recherche ne reconnaît pas et ne compense pas ces efforts. Cet article propose des moyens de récompenser une plus grande transparence de la recherche lors des recherches d'emploi universitaire, des évaluations de promotion et de titularisation universitaires, ainsi que des sélections de prix de sociétés savantes et de prix nationaux.

Cognitive scientists are increasingly enthusiastic about research transparency. However, their enthusiasm could be tempered if the research reward system fails to acknowledge and compensate these efforts. This article suggests ways to reward greater research transparency during academic job searches, academic promotion and tenure evaluations, and society and national award selections.

Bibliographie citée par cette référence

Les références citées sont importées depuis des sources externes de métadonnées lorsqu’elles sont disponibles. La liste peut être partielle.

  1. Naomi J. Schrag , G. Michael Purdy (2017). Step up for quality research . Science, 357(6351), 531-531. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1126/science.aan0859 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2743496931
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  2. National Institutes of Health (2014). Providing New Incentives to Foster Open Science and Increase Reproducibility .
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  3. Conor O’Carroll , Bernard Rentier , Cecilia Cabello Valdès , Fulvio Esposito , Eva Kaunismaa , Katrien Maas et al. (2017). Evaluation of Research Careers fully acknowledging Open Science Practices - Rewards, incentives and/or recognition for researchers practicing Open Science . Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).
    Type: Rapport OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2765235063
    OpenAlex
  4. Working Group on Rewards under Open Science (2017). Evaluation of Research Careers Fully Acknowledging Open Science Practices: Rewards, Incentives and/or Recognition for Researchers Practicing Open Science .
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  5. Michael R. Dougherty , L. Robert Slevc , James A. Grand (2019). Making Research Evaluation More Transparent: Aligning Research Philosophy, Institutional Values, and Reporting . Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 361-375. SAGE Publications.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1177/1745691618810693 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2787215008
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  6. Schönbrodt, F. (2018) Academic job offers that mentioned open science. Open Science Framework. Published online March 23, 2018. https://osf.io/7jbnt/
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  7. Brian A. Nosek , Lisa Cuevas Shaw , Timothy M. Errington , Nicole Pfeiffer , Maryam Zaringhalam (2017). Center for Open Science: Strategic Plan . Center for Open Science.
    Type: Prépublication DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/x2w9h OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2969914371
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  8. Anthony N. Washburn , Brittany E. Hanson , Matt Motyl , Linda J. Skitka , Caitlyn Yantis , Kendal M. Wong et al. (2018). Why Do Some Psychology Researchers Resist Adopting Proposed Reforms to Research Practices? A Description of Researchers’ Rationales . Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 166-173. SAGE Publications.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1177/2515245918757427 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2793704342
    Crossref OpenAlex
  9. Schönbrodt, F. (2016) Changing hiring practices towards research transparency: the first open science statement in a professorship advertisement. Felix Schönbrodt Blog. Published online January 6, 2016. http://www.nicebread.de/open-science-hiring-practices/
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  10. Gorgolewski, K. J. and Poldrack, R. A. (2017) Response to Next-Generation Data Science Challenges in Health and Biomedicine RFI, Stanford Center for Reproducible Neuroscience. Published online November 1, 2017. http://reproducibility.stanford.edu/response-to-next-generation-data-science-challenges-in-health-and-biomedicine-rfi/
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  11. G7 Science Ministers (2017) G7 Science Ministers’ Communiqué, G7 Science Ministers. http://www.g7italy.it/sites/default/files/documents/G7%20Science%20Communiqu%C3%A9.pdf
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  12. Southern Methodist University Psychology Department (2018) Policy on Research and Open Science, SMU Psychology Department. Published online March 22, 2018. https://www.smu.edu/-/media/Site/Dedman/Academics/Departments/Psychology/2018/Policy-on-Open-Science-032218.pdf
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  13. Voytek, B. (2018) Tenured! I’m sharing this from my Chair (with permission). Note her encouraging me to continue blogging. To continue my online presence. To continue outreach. I’m very lucky to be a part of @UCSanDiego. Twitter. Published online May 23, 2018. https://twitter.com/bradleyvoytek/status/999361441860763648
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  14. University of Cambridge Communications Office (2017) Step Inside the Mind of the Young Stephen Hawking as his PhD Thesis Goes Online for First Time, University of Cambridge. Published online October 23, 2018. http://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/step-inside-the-mind-of-the-young-stephen-hawking-as-his-phd-thesis-goes-online-for-first-time
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  15. Berez-Kroeker, A. L et al. (2017) The Austin Principles of Data Citation in Linguistics (Version 1. 0), Linguistics Data Interest Group, Research Data Alliance. Published online May 3, 2018. http://site.uit.no/linguisticsdatacitation/austinprinciples
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  16. Long, C. P. (2017) Reshaping the tenure and promotion process so that it becomes a catalyst for innovative and invigorating scholarship. LSE Impact Blog. Published online November 1, 2017. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2017/11/01/reshaping-the-tenure-and-promotion-process-so-that-it-becomes-a-catalyst-for-innovative-and-invigorating-scholarship/
    Type: Autre
    Crossref