Rewarding Research Transparency

Gernsbacher, M. A. (2018). Rewarding Research Transparency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(11), 953-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.07.002

Publication date: 23 Jul 2018 Added to AutiHub: 18 Jul 2026 Type: Article Article language: English

This publication is integrated into AutiHub through:

Authors

Publication authors
1
Publication authors identified as autistic
0 / 1 (0.0%)

Abstract

Cognitive scientists are increasingly enthusiastic about research transparency. However, their enthusiasm could be tempered if the research reward system fails to acknowledge and compensate these efforts. This article suggests ways to reward greater research transparency during academic job searches, academic promotion and tenure evaluations, and society and national award selections.

Bibliography cited by this reference

Cited references are imported from external metadata sources when they are available. The list may be partial.

  1. Naomi J. Schrag , G. Michael Purdy (2017). Step up for quality research . Science, 357(6351), 531-531. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  2. National Institutes of Health (2014). Providing New Incentives to Foster Open Science and Increase Reproducibility .
    Type: Other
    Crossref
  3. Conor O’Carroll , Bernard Rentier , Cecilia Cabello Valdès , Fulvio Esposito , Eva Kaunismaa , Katrien Maas et al. (2017). Evaluation of Research Careers fully acknowledging Open Science Practices - Rewards, incentives and/or recognition for researchers practicing Open Science . Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).
    Type: Report OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2765235063
    OpenAlex
  4. Working Group on Rewards under Open Science (2017). Evaluation of Research Careers Fully Acknowledging Open Science Practices: Rewards, Incentives and/or Recognition for Researchers Practicing Open Science .
    Type: Other
    Crossref
  5. Michael R. Dougherty , L. Robert Slevc , James A. Grand (2019). Making Research Evaluation More Transparent: Aligning Research Philosophy, Institutional Values, and Reporting . Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 361-375. SAGE Publications.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  6. Schönbrodt, F. (2018) Academic job offers that mentioned open science. Open Science Framework. Published online March 23, 2018. https://osf.io/7jbnt/
    Type: Other
    Crossref
  7. Brian A. Nosek , Lisa Cuevas Shaw , Timothy M. Errington , Nicole Pfeiffer , Maryam Zaringhalam (2017). Center for Open Science: Strategic Plan . Center for Open Science.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  8. Anthony N. Washburn , Brittany E. Hanson , Matt Motyl , Linda J. Skitka , Caitlyn Yantis , Kendal M. Wong et al. (2018). Why Do Some Psychology Researchers Resist Adopting Proposed Reforms to Research Practices? A Description of Researchers’ Rationales . Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 166-173. SAGE Publications.
    Crossref OpenAlex
  9. Schönbrodt, F. (2016) Changing hiring practices towards research transparency: the first open science statement in a professorship advertisement. Felix Schönbrodt Blog. Published online January 6, 2016. http://www.nicebread.de/open-science-hiring-practices/
    Type: Other
    Crossref
  10. Gorgolewski, K. J. and Poldrack, R. A. (2017) Response to Next-Generation Data Science Challenges in Health and Biomedicine RFI, Stanford Center for Reproducible Neuroscience. Published online November 1, 2017. http://reproducibility.stanford.edu/response-to-next-generation-data-science-challenges-in-health-and-biomedicine-rfi/
    Type: Other
    Crossref
  11. G7 Science Ministers (2017) G7 Science Ministers’ Communiqué, G7 Science Ministers. http://www.g7italy.it/sites/default/files/documents/G7%20Science%20Communiqu%C3%A9.pdf
    Type: Other
    Crossref
  12. Southern Methodist University Psychology Department (2018) Policy on Research and Open Science, SMU Psychology Department. Published online March 22, 2018. https://www.smu.edu/-/media/Site/Dedman/Academics/Departments/Psychology/2018/Policy-on-Open-Science-032218.pdf
    Type: Other
    Crossref
  13. Voytek, B. (2018) Tenured! I’m sharing this from my Chair (with permission). Note her encouraging me to continue blogging. To continue my online presence. To continue outreach. I’m very lucky to be a part of @UCSanDiego. Twitter. Published online May 23, 2018. https://twitter.com/bradleyvoytek/status/999361441860763648
    Type: Other
    Crossref
  14. University of Cambridge Communications Office (2017) Step Inside the Mind of the Young Stephen Hawking as his PhD Thesis Goes Online for First Time, University of Cambridge. Published online October 23, 2018. http://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/step-inside-the-mind-of-the-young-stephen-hawking-as-his-phd-thesis-goes-online-for-first-time
    Type: Other
    Crossref
  15. Berez-Kroeker, A. L et al. (2017) The Austin Principles of Data Citation in Linguistics (Version 1. 0), Linguistics Data Interest Group, Research Data Alliance. Published online May 3, 2018. http://site.uit.no/linguisticsdatacitation/austinprinciples
    Type: Other
    Crossref
  16. Long, C. P. (2017) Reshaping the tenure and promotion process so that it becomes a catalyst for innovative and invigorating scholarship. LSE Impact Blog. Published online November 1, 2017. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2017/11/01/reshaping-the-tenure-and-promotion-process-so-that-it-becomes-a-catalyst-for-innovative-and-invigorating-scholarship/
    Type: Other
    Crossref