Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 11/03/2013 04:47

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Jeffrey Chan, Lynne S. Webber, Brent Hayward (2013). Examining the Use of Restrictive Interventions in Respite Services in an Australian Jurisdiction. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20(6), 921-931. Informa UK Limited.

Date de publication
décembre 2013
Identifiant
10.1080/13218719.2013.770357
Auteurs
Jeffrey Chan, Lynne S. Webber, Brent Hayward
Source
Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
Détails
20(6), 921-931
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Informa UK Limited
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Very little is known about the use of restrictive interventions on children and young people with disabilities and challenging behaviours who receive respite. This study examines the use of restrictive interventions in an Australian jurisdiction where there is mandatory reporting of these practices in government-funded services. The characteristics of those subject to restrictive interventions and the types of restraint and seclusion used in respite are compared with those in people who do not receive respite. Approximately 28% (n = 578) of the total number of people with disabilities subjected to restrictive interventions were from respite services. They were generally male, younger (average age 21 years old) and reported to have a diagnosis of autism. The majority were subject to chemical restraint. The use of restrictive interventions in respite services requires further investigation and monitoring. There are policy and practice implications for respite service delivery.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée