Michelle Dawson posts
Structured cited links
Jeffrey Chan, Lynne S. Webber, Brent Hayward (2013). Examining the Use of Restrictive Interventions in Respite Services in an Australian Jurisdiction. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20(6), 921-931. Informa UK Limited.
Abstract
Very little is known about the use of restrictive interventions on children and young people with disabilities and challenging behaviours who receive respite. This study examines the use of restrictive interventions in an Australian jurisdiction where there is mandatory reporting of these practices in government-funded services. The characteristics of those subject to restrictive interventions and the types of restraint and seclusion used in respite are compared with those in people who do not receive respite. Approximately 28% (n = 578) of the total number of people with disabilities subjected to restrictive interventions were from respite services. They were generally male, younger (average age 21 years old) and reported to have a diagnosis of autism. The majority were subject to chemical restraint. The use of restrictive interventions in respite services requires further investigation and monitoring. There are policy and practice implications for respite service delivery.
Study authors in this cited reference