Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 18/07/2026 12:14

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

The unethical promotion rapid prompting & its variants has harmed autistics a lot--& so has the unethical practice (as in this review) of denying any communication to any autistic who in the past has ever been subject to rapid prompting etc link.springer.com/article/10.1... ABA-based standards, free

Voir sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Ralf W. Schlosser, Shane Howard, Lucy Bryant, Katharine Beals, James Todd, Russell Lang, Sharon Skinner, Bronwyn Hemsley (2026). Systematic Review of Authorship in Rapid Prompting Method, Spelling to Communicate, and Variants: Outcomes, Significance and Clinical Implications. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

Date de publication
17/07/2026
Identifiant
10.1007/s40489-026-00569-7
Auteurs
Ralf W. Schlosser, Shane Howard, Lucy Bryant, Katharine Beals, James Todd, Russell Lang, Sharon Skinner, Bronwyn Hemsley
Source
Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract This is a systematic review of authorship in Rapid Prompting Method (RPM), Spelling2Communicate (S2C), Spellers Method and variants, techniques akin to Facilitated Communication which are increasingly promoted for use on autistic individuals or people with intellectual or developmental disabilities who are minimally- or non-speaking. In this systematic review, RPM/S2C or variants had to be evaluated as an intervention using a research design capable of empirical demonstration of authorship. The resulting empty review documents a persistent knowledge gap which, in the context of increasing popularity and similarity to Facilitated Communication, constitutes a finding with clinical significance. Controlled authorship trials of RPM, S2C, and Spellers Method are warranted. Given the instrumental similarities between RPM, S2C, Spellers Method, and traditional Facilitated Communication, these methods should be discontinued (if in use) or not adopted until independent authorship studies have shown that these methods are indeed valid. Ethical implications of the findings are also discussed.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée