Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 18 Jul 2026 12:14

Bluesky DOI work crossref External link integrated into the post Autism terms

The unethical promotion rapid prompting & its variants has harmed autistics a lot--& so has the unethical practice (as in this review) of denying any communication to any autistic who in the past has ever been subject to rapid prompting etc link.springer.com/article/10.1... ABA-based standards, free

View on Bluesky

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Ralf W. Schlosser, Shane Howard, Lucy Bryant, Katharine Beals, James Todd, Russell Lang, Sharon Skinner, Bronwyn Hemsley (2026). Systematic Review of Authorship in Rapid Prompting Method, Spelling to Communicate, and Variants: Outcomes, Significance and Clinical Implications. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

Publication date
17 Jul 2026
Identifier
10.1007/s40489-026-00569-7
Authors
Ralf W. Schlosser, Shane Howard, Lucy Bryant, Katharine Beals, James Todd, Russell Lang, Sharon Skinner, Bronwyn Hemsley
Source
Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Reference type
article
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract This is a systematic review of authorship in Rapid Prompting Method (RPM), Spelling2Communicate (S2C), Spellers Method and variants, techniques akin to Facilitated Communication which are increasingly promoted for use on autistic individuals or people with intellectual or developmental disabilities who are minimally- or non-speaking. In this systematic review, RPM/S2C or variants had to be evaluated as an intervention using a research design capable of empirical demonstration of authorship. The resulting empty review documents a persistent knowledge gap which, in the context of increasing popularity and similarity to Facilitated Communication, constitutes a finding with clinical significance. Controlled authorship trials of RPM, S2C, and Spellers Method are warranted. Given the instrumental similarities between RPM, S2C, Spellers Method, and traditional Facilitated Communication, these methods should be discontinued (if in use) or not adopted until independent authorship studies have shown that these methods are indeed valid. Ethical implications of the findings are also discussed.

Study authors in this cited reference