Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 18/03/2026 10:36

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Mood & anxiety measures adapted for autistic adults, systematic review link.springer.com/article/10.1... of 32 studies, only 1 "included autistic individuals in the adaptation process"?--but this is "not accounting for studies authored by autistic researchers who did not explicitly indicate as such"

Voir sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Ellen Wilkinson, Alexis M. Brewe, Richard P. Hastings, Andrew Jahoda, Susan W. White, Vanessa H. Bal (2026). Adapting Measures of Anxiety and Mood Disorders for Use with Autistic Adults: A Systematic Review. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 13(1), 4. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

Date de publication
16/03/2026
Identifiant
10.1007/s40474-026-00348-3
Auteurs
Ellen Wilkinson, Alexis M. Brewe, Richard P. Hastings, Andrew Jahoda, Susan W. White, Vanessa H. Bal
Source
Current Developmental Disorders Reports
Détails
13(1), 4
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract Purpose of Review The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the adaptations made to existing anxiety and mood disorder measures used with autistic adults. It addresses the types of modifications made to such measures, the processes behind them, and the involvement of autistic individuals. Recent Findings Following PRISMA guidelines, the review searched four major databases for studies published in English since 1994 that used mood or anxiety measures with autistic adults. Out of 14,583 identified studies, 32 met the inclusion criteria for reporting adaptations. Data extraction used modified FRAME and GRIPP2 frameworks to capture the nature and justification of adaptations and the role of stakeholder involvement. Summary The review found that only 8% of studies using mood or anxiety measures with autistic adults reported any adaptations, most of which involved using tools developed for children or converting self-report measures to proxy-report without clear justification. Very few studies included psychometric validation of the adapted tools, and only one study explicitly involved autistic adults in the adaptation process. The findings highlight a critical need for transparency in reporting adaptations, involvement of autistic individuals in tool development, and validation of adapted instruments to ensure accurate mental health assessment in autistic populations.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée