Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 15/11/2025 11:54

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

"interventions appear capable of changing attentional patterns in autism" but "it remains uncertain if such changes translate into functional gains in daily social communication, adaptive behavior, or overall quality of life"? what about harms? onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/... free

Voir sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Christy D. Yoon, Yan Xia, Adriana Kaori Terol, Hedda Meadan, Frederick Shic (2025). Eye Tracking as a Treatment Monitoring Tool for Autism: A Multilevel Meta‐Analysis. Autism Research, 18(12), 2548-2565. Wiley.

Date de publication
14/11/2025
Identifiant
10.1002/aur.70141
Auteurs
Christy D. Yoon, Yan Xia, Adriana Kaori Terol, Hedda Meadan, Frederick Shic
Source
Autism Research
Détails
18(12), 2548-2565
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

ABSTRACT There is a growing body of evidence suggesting a concurrent association between attentional indices measured via eye tracking and autism symptoms. This meta‐analysis examined the utility of eye tracking within longitudinal frameworks for autism interventions, including treatment monitoring and prediction of treatment response. We conducted a multivariate random‐effects meta‐analysis with a multilevel structure on 25 studies (828 autistic participants; M age = 3–28 years) to estimate: (a) changes in eye‐tracking outcomes from pre‐ to post‐treatment (k = 179); and (b) the correlation between baseline eye‐tracking profiles and changes in developmental outcomes following treatment (k = 39). Our analysis revealed a moderate and significant summary effect size for changes in eye‐tracking outcomes from pre‐ to post‐treatment (Hedge's g = 0.32, p = 0.010). Additionally, a moderate but non‐significant summary effect size was revealed for the correlation between baseline eye‐tracking outcomes and changes in developmental outcomes following treatment (Fisher's z = 0.20, p = 0.115), with moderation effects observed based on developmental domain and sex. These findings highlight the potential of eye tracking as a tool for monitoring treatment‐induced changes in autistic individuals, while its predictive utility remains less supported. Limitations and implications are discussed.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée