Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 29/07/2025 12:13

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

"a practical roadmap to transform co-production into a tool for justice and collaboration, ensuring neurodivergent people are partners, not just participants"?--commentary, free journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/... note: the most important people in autism research are autistic study participants

Voir sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Lauren Powell (2025). We’re Not Your Empathy Exercise: Reclaiming Co-Production in Neurodivergent Research and Practice. Neurodiversity, 3, 27546330251363393. SAGE Publications.

Date de publication
28/07/2025
Identifiant
10.1177/27546330251363393
Auteurs
Lauren Powell
Source
Neurodiversity
Détails
3, 27546330251363393
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
SAGE Publications
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Co-production, a collaborative approach to research and practice, has gained traction in neurodiversity studies as a means to include autistic and otherwise neurodivergent individuals. However, superficial or under-supported co-production risks losing its transformative potential, leaving contributors feeling exploited or excluded. This commentary draws on personal experience as a late-diagnosed autistic and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) academic woman to examine the risks of tokenistic or extractive co-production and proposes a justice-oriented vision rooted in equity, accountability, and solidarity. Key terms are defined, the distinction between inclusion and equity is explored, and practical principles for ethical co-production are outlined. Emphasising ethical listening, intersectionality, and clear feedback loops, this paper offers a constructive path towards relational justice and neurodivergent leadership. Lay Abstract Co-production in neurodivergence research aims to involve autistic and neurodivergent people as equal partners, but shallow efforts can leave contributors feeling used or ignored. As a late-diagnosed autistic and ADHD academic woman, I explore these challenges and propose a better way forward. Too often, neurodivergent voices are heard but not acted upon, turning co-production into storytelling without power-sharing. This commentary outlines six principles for ethical co-production, focusing on equity, transparency, and diverse inclusion, especially for marginalised groups like non-speaking individuals or those with intellectual disabilities. By valuing lived experience as expertise, ensuring clear feedback, and supporting neurodivergent leadership, research can truly empower communities. Funders and researchers must provide accessible tools, fair pay, and shared decision-making to make co-production meaningful. This approach not only improves research but also drives real-world change in policy and practice, respecting neurodivergent identities. Written for researchers, funders, and advocates, this commentary offers a practical roadmap to transform co-production into a tool for justice and collaboration, ensuring neurodivergent people are partners, not just participants.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée