Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 22/07/2025 12:34

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Neurodiversity 2.0? www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... "3 interrelated tensions shape the limitations of current neurodiversity discourse: social narratives that prioritize independence & productivity, discomfort with the role of medical models, and exclusionary patterns in research and policy"?

Voir sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Hari Srinivasan (2025). Neurodiversity 2.0 - Harnessing cross-disciplinary disability insights. Research in Autism, 127, 202652. Elsevier BV.

Date de publication
septembre 2025
Identifiant
10.1016/j.reia.2025.202652
Auteurs
Hari Srinivasan
Source
Research in Autism
Détails
127, 202652
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

The neurodiversity movement has reframed cognitive and behavioral differences as natural variations rather than deficits, advocating for social inclusion and systemic change. However, as the movement has gained traction, it has also revealed tensions surrounding independence, economic valuation, medical research, the representation of high-support-needs individuals, and intersecting disabilities. This paper introduces Neurodiversity 2.0, an expanded framework that integrates insights from disability studies, social justice, and policy to address these gaps. By analyzing key tensions, drawing from theoretical perspectives such as relational autonomy, Crip Theory, and Disability Justice, and proposing systemic policy shifts, the paper argues for an approach that balances opportunities (leveraging strengths), with solutions (to address challenges). The current discourse often presents false binaries—social vs. medical models, autonomy vs. dependence, strengths vs. deficits—when, in reality, inclusion requires an integrated approach. This paper advocates for proactive, flexible, and participatory systems across research, education, employment, and healthcare that center both access and agency. By moving beyond reactive accommodations to proactive systems design, Neurodiversity 2.0 seeks to create structures that recognize and support the full spectrum of neurodivergent experiences.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée