Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 22 Jul 2025 12:34

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Neurodiversity 2.0? www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... "3 interrelated tensions shape the limitations of current neurodiversity discourse: social narratives that prioritize independence & productivity, discomfort with the role of medical models, and exclusionary patterns in research and policy"?

View on Bluesky

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Hari Srinivasan (2025). Neurodiversity 2.0 - Harnessing cross-disciplinary disability insights. Research in Autism, 127, 202652. Elsevier BV.

Publication date
September 2025
Identifier
10.1016/j.reia.2025.202652
Authors
Hari Srinivasan
Source
Research in Autism
Details
127, 202652
Reference type
article
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

The neurodiversity movement has reframed cognitive and behavioral differences as natural variations rather than deficits, advocating for social inclusion and systemic change. However, as the movement has gained traction, it has also revealed tensions surrounding independence, economic valuation, medical research, the representation of high-support-needs individuals, and intersecting disabilities. This paper introduces Neurodiversity 2.0, an expanded framework that integrates insights from disability studies, social justice, and policy to address these gaps. By analyzing key tensions, drawing from theoretical perspectives such as relational autonomy, Crip Theory, and Disability Justice, and proposing systemic policy shifts, the paper argues for an approach that balances opportunities (leveraging strengths), with solutions (to address challenges). The current discourse often presents false binaries—social vs. medical models, autonomy vs. dependence, strengths vs. deficits—when, in reality, inclusion requires an integrated approach. This paper advocates for proactive, flexible, and participatory systems across research, education, employment, and healthcare that center both access and agency. By moving beyond reactive accommodations to proactive systems design, Neurodiversity 2.0 seeks to create structures that recognize and support the full spectrum of neurodivergent experiences.

Study authors in this cited reference