Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 27/04/2025 11:12

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Non-autistics "changed their face-directed gaze by looking at the open-ended questioner’s face significantly less compared to their gaze during the easier-to-answer, yes/no question" www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... but autistics "showed no such gaze difference across question type"?

Voir sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Ruth B. Grossman, Amelia Rees, Julia Mertens, Emily Zane (2025). Impact of conversational context on gaze patterns of autistic and non-autistic adolescents. Research in Autism, 125, 202606. Elsevier BV.

Date de publication
juillet 2025
Identifiant
10.1016/j.reia.2025.202606
Auteurs
Ruth B. Grossman, Amelia Rees, Julia Mertens, Emily Zane
Source
Research in Autism
Détails
125, 202606
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Purpose Few studies of social gaze by autistic individuals have focused on live interactions and those studies have been limited to conversations with a single partner. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of conversational variations in cognitive load on social gaze of autistic and non-autistic adolescents while engaging with two conversation partners. Methods Participants engaged in a conversation where two research assistants (RAs) and the participant each shared personal memories and engaged with each other through question asking and commenting. We used eye-tracking glasses to record and analyze participants’ gaze in response to two questions: One question was open-ended and referenced an unusual topic (high cognitive demand), while the other question required a simple yes or no response about a common topic (low cognitive demand). Results Non-autistic adolescents gazed more at the faces of either RA than their autistic peers. Both participant groups gazed more at the face of the RA who had just asked a question. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons revealed that non-autistic participants gazed significantly more at the RA asking the yes/no question than the RA asking the open-ended question condition, but autistic participants showed no such gaze difference across question type. Conclusion These findings indicate a pattern of interactional gaze that is influenced not only by neurotype, but also by conversational features, such as the difficulty of the question and the overall social demands of interacting with more than one person.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée