Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 25/10/2022 13:19

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

1 réponse intégrée de Michelle Dawson

25/10/2022 13:27

Note: the N=3 autistic children in this ABA study were referred to a "challenging behavior" treatment clinic, due to "severe task disengagement" which is reported to include "sitting quietly without working" & "placing her head down on the desk"

Voir la réponse sur Twitter/X

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Matthew J. O’Brien, Patrick W. Romani, Wendy K. Berg, David P. Wacker (2023). The effects of noncontingent reinforcement on task disengagement following failure of differential reinforcement treatment. Behavioral Interventions, 38(1), 62-79. Wiley.

Date de publication
17/10/2022
Identifiant
10.1002/bin.1916
Auteurs
Matthew J. O’Brien, Patrick W. Romani, Wendy K. Berg, David P. Wacker
Source
Behavioral Interventions
Détails
38(1), 62-79
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract Following the failure of applications of differential reinforcement (DR), the effects of reinforcement delivered noncontingently (NCR) on task disengagement and task completion were evaluated within reversal designs for three children with autism spectrum disorder. In Experiment 1, we compared DR and NCR schedules that combined positive and negative reinforcement. In Experiment 2, we replicated the results of Experiment 1 and then evaluated NCR schedules composed solely of negative reinforcement and NCR schedules that combined negative reinforcement with high‐or low‐preferred stimuli. In Experiment 3, we further analyzed NCR schedules that included different types and qualities of positive reinforcement, but without the inclusion of negative reinforcement. The results showed that NCR schedules using positive reinforcers can be effective as a treatment for task disengagement, but the type and preference of the reinforcer can alter effectiveness. These results are interpreted in terms of the motivating operations associated with task disengagement.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée