Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 25 Oct 2022 13:19

Twitter/X DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

1 integrated reply by Michelle Dawson

25 Oct 2022 13:27

Note: the N=3 autistic children in this ABA study were referred to a "challenging behavior" treatment clinic, due to "severe task disengagement" which is reported to include "sitting quietly without working" & "placing her head down on the desk"

View reply on Twitter/X

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Matthew J. O’Brien, Patrick W. Romani, Wendy K. Berg, David P. Wacker (2023). The effects of noncontingent reinforcement on task disengagement following failure of differential reinforcement treatment. Behavioral Interventions, 38(1), 62-79. Wiley.

Publication date
17 Oct 2022
Identifier
10.1002/bin.1916
Authors
Matthew J. O’Brien, Patrick W. Romani, Wendy K. Berg, David P. Wacker
Source
Behavioral Interventions
Details
38(1), 62-79
Reference type
article
Publisher
Wiley
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract Following the failure of applications of differential reinforcement (DR), the effects of reinforcement delivered noncontingently (NCR) on task disengagement and task completion were evaluated within reversal designs for three children with autism spectrum disorder. In Experiment 1, we compared DR and NCR schedules that combined positive and negative reinforcement. In Experiment 2, we replicated the results of Experiment 1 and then evaluated NCR schedules composed solely of negative reinforcement and NCR schedules that combined negative reinforcement with high‐or low‐preferred stimuli. In Experiment 3, we further analyzed NCR schedules that included different types and qualities of positive reinforcement, but without the inclusion of negative reinforcement. The results showed that NCR schedules using positive reinforcers can be effective as a treatment for task disengagement, but the type and preference of the reinforcer can alter effectiveness. These results are interpreted in terms of the motivating operations associated with task disengagement.

Study authors in this cited reference