Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 01/04/2022 13:30

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Emily C. Taylor, George D. Farmer, Lucy A. Livingston, Mitchell J. Callan, Punit Shah (2022). Rethinking fast and slow processing in autism.. Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science, 131(4), 392-406. American Psychological Association (APA).

Date de publication
mai 2022
Identifiant
10.1037/abn0000734
Auteurs
Emily C. Taylor, George D. Farmer, Lucy A. Livingston, Mitchell J. Callan, Punit Shah
Source
Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science
Détails
131(4), 392-406
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
American Psychological Association (APA)
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Following the popularity of dual process models in social and cognitive psychology, there is major interest in the possibility that autism is associated with impaired "fast" intuitive thinking but enhanced "slow" or "rational" deliberative thinking. If correct, this has great potential to help understand various strengths and difficulties characteristic of autism. Previous empirical investigations of this phenomenon, however, are marred by concerns about the measurement of intuitive and deliberative processing, as well as broader problems in clinical psychological science (e.g., small underpowered studies, lack of replication). Making a step change, we conducted four large-scale studies to examine dual processing in autism, including a preregistered comparison of 200 autistic and nonautistic adults. Participants completed contemporary cognitive and self-report measures of intuitive and deliberative processing, as well as a psychometrically robust measure of general cognitive ability. Except for lower self-reported intuitive thinking, we found no unique contributions of autism to intuitive or deliberative thinking across all four studies, as evidenced by frequentist and Bayesian analyses. Overall, these studies indicate that intuitive and deliberative thinking is neither enhanced nor particularly impaired in relation to autism. We deliberate on the implications of these findings for theories of autism and future investigation of strengths and difficulties in autistic people. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée