DOI work
Fetched
Post
crossref
Emily C. Taylor, George D. Farmer, Lucy A. Livingston, Mitchell J. Callan, Punit Shah
(2022).
Rethinking fast and slow processing in autism..
Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science, 131(4), 392-406.
American Psychological Association (APA).
- Publication date
-
May 2022
- Identifier
-
10.1037/abn0000734
- Authors
-
Emily C. Taylor,
George D. Farmer,
Lucy A. Livingston,
Mitchell J. Callan,
Punit Shah
- Source
- Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science
- Details
- 131(4), 392-406
- Reference type
- article
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association (APA)
- Metadata source
- crossref
Abstract
Following the popularity of dual process models in social and cognitive psychology, there is major interest in the possibility that autism is associated with impaired "fast" intuitive thinking but enhanced "slow" or "rational" deliberative thinking. If correct, this has great potential to help understand various strengths and difficulties characteristic of autism. Previous empirical investigations of this phenomenon, however, are marred by concerns about the measurement of intuitive and deliberative processing, as well as broader problems in clinical psychological science (e.g., small underpowered studies, lack of replication). Making a step change, we conducted four large-scale studies to examine dual processing in autism, including a preregistered comparison of 200 autistic and nonautistic adults. Participants completed contemporary cognitive and self-report measures of intuitive and deliberative processing, as well as a psychometrically robust measure of general cognitive ability. Except for lower self-reported intuitive thinking, we found no unique contributions of autism to intuitive or deliberative thinking across all four studies, as evidenced by frequentist and Bayesian analyses. Overall, these studies indicate that intuitive and deliberative thinking is neither enhanced nor particularly impaired in relation to autism. We deliberate on the implications of these findings for theories of autism and future investigation of strengths and difficulties in autistic people. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Study authors in this cited reference