Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 07/03/2022 15:55

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Jeroen de Ridder (2022). How to trust a scientist. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 93, 11-20. Elsevier BV.

Date de publication
juin 2022
Identifiant
10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.02.003
Auteurs
Jeroen de Ridder
Source
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Détails
93, 11-20
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Epistemic trust among scientists is inevitable. There are two questions about this: (1) What is the content of this trust, what do scientists trust each other for? (2) Is such trust epistemically justified? I argue that if we assume a traditional answer to (1), namely that scientists trust each other to be reliable informants, then the answer to question (2) is negative, certainly for the biomedical and social sciences. This motivates a different construal of trust among scientists and therefore a different answer to (1): scientists trust each other to only testify to claims that are backed by evidence gathered in accordance with prevailing methodological standards. On this answer, trust among scientists is epistemically justified.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée