Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 7 Mar 2022 15:55

Twitter/X DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Jeroen de Ridder (2022). How to trust a scientist. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 93, 11-20. Elsevier BV.

Publication date
June 2022
Identifier
10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.02.003
Authors
Jeroen de Ridder
Source
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Details
93, 11-20
Reference type
article
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Epistemic trust among scientists is inevitable. There are two questions about this: (1) What is the content of this trust, what do scientists trust each other for? (2) Is such trust epistemically justified? I argue that if we assume a traditional answer to (1), namely that scientists trust each other to be reliable informants, then the answer to question (2) is negative, certainly for the biomedical and social sciences. This motivates a different construal of trust among scientists and therefore a different answer to (1): scientists trust each other to only testify to claims that are backed by evidence gathered in accordance with prevailing methodological standards. On this answer, trust among scientists is epistemically justified.

Study authors in this cited reference