Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 04/01/2022 14:16

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Louise Barrett, S. Peter Henzi, Robert A. Barton (2022). Experts in action: why we need an embodied social brain hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 377(1844), 20200533. The Royal Society.

Date de publication
27/12/2021
Identifiant
10.1098/rstb.2020.0533
Auteurs
Louise Barrett, S. Peter Henzi, Robert A. Barton
Source
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
Détails
377(1844), 20200533
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
The Royal Society
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract The anthropoid primates are known for their intense sociality and large brain size. The idea that these might be causally related has given rise to a large body of work testing the ‘social brain hypothesis'. Here, the emphasis has been placed on the political demands of social life, and the cognitive skills that would enable animals to track the machinations of other minds in metarepresentational ways. It seems to us that this position risks losing touch with the fact that brains primarily evolved to enable the control of action, which in turn leads us to downplay or neglect the importance of the physical body in a material world full of bodies and other objects. As an alternative, we offer a view of primate brain and social evolution that is grounded in the body and action, rather than minds and metarepresentation. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Systems neuroscience through the lens of evolutionary theory’.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée