Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 4 Jan 2022 14:16

Twitter/X DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Louise Barrett, S. Peter Henzi, Robert A. Barton (2022). Experts in action: why we need an embodied social brain hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 377(1844), 20200533. The Royal Society.

Publication date
27 Dec 2021
Identifier
10.1098/rstb.2020.0533
Authors
Louise Barrett, S. Peter Henzi, Robert A. Barton
Source
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
Details
377(1844), 20200533
Reference type
article
Publisher
The Royal Society
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract The anthropoid primates are known for their intense sociality and large brain size. The idea that these might be causally related has given rise to a large body of work testing the ‘social brain hypothesis'. Here, the emphasis has been placed on the political demands of social life, and the cognitive skills that would enable animals to track the machinations of other minds in metarepresentational ways. It seems to us that this position risks losing touch with the fact that brains primarily evolved to enable the control of action, which in turn leads us to downplay or neglect the importance of the physical body in a material world full of bodies and other objects. As an alternative, we offer a view of primate brain and social evolution that is grounded in the body and action, rather than minds and metarepresentation. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Systems neuroscience through the lens of evolutionary theory’.

Study authors in this cited reference