Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 29/07/2021 02:00

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Lien intégré au billet

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Katherine A. DeCelles, Gabrielle S. Adams, Holly S. Howe, Leslie K. John (2021). Anger Damns the Innocent. Psychological Science, 32(8), 1214-1226. SAGE Publications.

Date de publication
28/07/2021
Identifiant
10.1177/0956797621994770
Auteurs
Katherine A. DeCelles, Gabrielle S. Adams, Holly S. Howe, Leslie K. John
Source
Psychological Science
Détails
32(8), 1214-1226
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
SAGE Publications
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

False accusations of wrongdoing are common and can have grave consequences. In six studies, we document a worrisome paradox in perceivers’ subjective judgments of a suspect’s guilt. Specifically, we found that people (including online panelists, n = 4,983, and working professionals such as fraud investigators and auditors, n = 136) use suspects’ angry responses to accusations as cues of guilt. However, we found that such anger is an invalid cue of guilt and is instead a valid cue of innocence; accused individuals (university students, n = 230) and online panelists (n = 401) were angrier when they are falsely relative to accurately accused. Moreover, we found that individuals who remain silent are perceived to be at least as guilty as those who angrily deny an accusation.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée