Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 29 Jul 2021 02:00

Twitter/X DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post External link integrated into the post

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Katherine A. DeCelles, Gabrielle S. Adams, Holly S. Howe, Leslie K. John (2021). Anger Damns the Innocent. Psychological Science, 32(8), 1214-1226. SAGE Publications.

Publication date
28 Jul 2021
Identifier
10.1177/0956797621994770
Authors
Katherine A. DeCelles, Gabrielle S. Adams, Holly S. Howe, Leslie K. John
Source
Psychological Science
Details
32(8), 1214-1226
Reference type
article
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

False accusations of wrongdoing are common and can have grave consequences. In six studies, we document a worrisome paradox in perceivers’ subjective judgments of a suspect’s guilt. Specifically, we found that people (including online panelists, n = 4,983, and working professionals such as fraud investigators and auditors, n = 136) use suspects’ angry responses to accusations as cues of guilt. However, we found that such anger is an invalid cue of guilt and is instead a valid cue of innocence; accused individuals (university students, n = 230) and online panelists (n = 401) were angrier when they are falsely relative to accurately accused. Moreover, we found that individuals who remain silent are perceived to be at least as guilty as those who angrily deny an accusation.

Study authors in this cited reference