Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 05/05/2021 12:25

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

1 réponse intégrée de Michelle Dawson

05/05/2021 12:30

Note: the authors cite one of my tweets, here it is https://t.co/MDI5bRQyin

Voir la réponse sur Twitter/X

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Kristen Bottema-Beutel, Shannon Crowley (2021). Pervasive Undisclosed Conflicts of Interest in Applied Behavior Analysis Autism Literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 676303. Frontiers Media SA.

Date de publication
05/05/2021
Identifiant
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.676303
Auteurs
Kristen Bottema-Beutel, Shannon Crowley
Source
Frontiers in Psychology
Détails
12, 676303
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Frontiers Media SA
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Many autistic people (including researchers and non-researchers) are becoming increasingly involved in, and increasingly critical of, autism intervention research. They have expressed concerns regarding applied behavior analysis (ABA) interventions on a number of grounds, one of which is the prevalence of conflicts of interests (COIs) among autism intervention researchers. These concerns are now also being addressed by non-autistic researchers. COIs can introduce bias into the research process, and allow researchers to demonstrate positive effects for interventions that are not actually effective. Despite these concerns, there are no studies to date that examine the prevalence of COIs in behavioral journals. Because ABA services are routinely provided to autistic people in the United States as a means to address difficulties experienced by autistic people, this is an important area of investigation. We tallied author COIs in articles published over a 1-year period that tested, commented on, or reviewed ABA autism intervention strategies, extracted from eight journals devoted to publishing behavioral research. We coded included studies for COIs related to researcher employment as an ABA clinical provider or a training consultant to ABA clinical providers. We found that 84% of studies had at least one author with this type of COI, but they were only disclosed as COIs in 2% of studies. Additionally, 87% of studies with statements claiming the authors did not have COIs, were authored by researchers found to have clinical/training consultancy COIs. Pervasive, undisclosed COIs likely lead to researcher bias, and could at least partially account for persistent poor quality research in this area. The high prevalence of COIs among this research corroborates the concerns expressed by many autistic people. The autism community – including autistic people, autism researchers, and other stakeholders – should be aware of the prevalence of undisclosed COIs in this literature and take this into account when using, providing, or recommending ABA services.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée