Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 5 May 2021 12:25

Twitter/X DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

1 integrated reply by Michelle Dawson

5 May 2021 12:30

Note: the authors cite one of my tweets, here it is https://t.co/MDI5bRQyin

View reply on Twitter/X

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Kristen Bottema-Beutel, Shannon Crowley (2021). Pervasive Undisclosed Conflicts of Interest in Applied Behavior Analysis Autism Literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 676303. Frontiers Media SA.

Publication date
5 May 2021
Identifier
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.676303
Authors
Kristen Bottema-Beutel, Shannon Crowley
Source
Frontiers in Psychology
Details
12, 676303
Reference type
article
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Many autistic people (including researchers and non-researchers) are becoming increasingly involved in, and increasingly critical of, autism intervention research. They have expressed concerns regarding applied behavior analysis (ABA) interventions on a number of grounds, one of which is the prevalence of conflicts of interests (COIs) among autism intervention researchers. These concerns are now also being addressed by non-autistic researchers. COIs can introduce bias into the research process, and allow researchers to demonstrate positive effects for interventions that are not actually effective. Despite these concerns, there are no studies to date that examine the prevalence of COIs in behavioral journals. Because ABA services are routinely provided to autistic people in the United States as a means to address difficulties experienced by autistic people, this is an important area of investigation. We tallied author COIs in articles published over a 1-year period that tested, commented on, or reviewed ABA autism intervention strategies, extracted from eight journals devoted to publishing behavioral research. We coded included studies for COIs related to researcher employment as an ABA clinical provider or a training consultant to ABA clinical providers. We found that 84% of studies had at least one author with this type of COI, but they were only disclosed as COIs in 2% of studies. Additionally, 87% of studies with statements claiming the authors did not have COIs, were authored by researchers found to have clinical/training consultancy COIs. Pervasive, undisclosed COIs likely lead to researcher bias, and could at least partially account for persistent poor quality research in this area. The high prevalence of COIs among this research corroborates the concerns expressed by many autistic people. The autism community – including autistic people, autism researchers, and other stakeholders – should be aware of the prevalence of undisclosed COIs in this literature and take this into account when using, providing, or recommending ABA services.

Study authors in this cited reference