Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 14/11/2020 01:30

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Rebecca P. Lawson, James Bisby, Camilla L. Nord, Neil Burgess, Geraint Rees (2021). The Computational, Pharmacological, and Physiological Determinants of Sensory Learning under Uncertainty. Current Biology, 31(1), 163-172.e4. Elsevier BV.

Date de publication
janvier 2021
Identifiant
10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.043
Auteurs
Rebecca P. Lawson, James Bisby, Camilla L. Nord, Neil Burgess, Geraint Rees
Source
Current Biology
Détails
31(1), 163-172.e4
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

The ability to represent and respond to uncertainty is fundamental to human cognition and decision-making. Noradrenaline (NA) is hypothesized to play a key role in coordinating the sensory, learning, and physiological states necessary to adapt to a changing world, but direct evidence for this is lacking in humans. Here, we tested the effects of attenuating noradrenergic neurotransmission on learning under uncertainty. We probed the effects of the β-adrenergic receptor antagonist propranolol (40 mg) using a between-subjects, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Participants performed a probabilistic associative learning task, and we employed a hierarchical learning model to formally quantify prediction errors about cue-outcome contingencies and changes in these associations over time (volatility). Both unexpectedness and noise slowed down reaction times, but propranolol augmented the interaction between these main effects such that behavior was influenced more by prior expectations when uncertainty was high. Computationally, this was driven by a reduction in learning rates, with people slower to update their beliefs in the face of new information. Attenuating the global effects of NA also eliminated the phasic effects of prediction error and volatility on pupil size, consistent with slower belief updating. Finally, estimates of environmental volatility were predicted by baseline cardiac measures in all participants. Our results demonstrate that NA underpins behavioral and computational responses to uncertainty. These findings have important implications for understanding the impact of uncertainty on human biology and cognition.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée