Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 14 Nov 2020 01:30

Twitter/X DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Rebecca P. Lawson, James Bisby, Camilla L. Nord, Neil Burgess, Geraint Rees (2021). The Computational, Pharmacological, and Physiological Determinants of Sensory Learning under Uncertainty. Current Biology, 31(1), 163-172.e4. Elsevier BV.

Publication date
January 2021
Identifier
10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.043
Authors
Rebecca P. Lawson, James Bisby, Camilla L. Nord, Neil Burgess, Geraint Rees
Source
Current Biology
Details
31(1), 163-172.e4
Reference type
article
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

The ability to represent and respond to uncertainty is fundamental to human cognition and decision-making. Noradrenaline (NA) is hypothesized to play a key role in coordinating the sensory, learning, and physiological states necessary to adapt to a changing world, but direct evidence for this is lacking in humans. Here, we tested the effects of attenuating noradrenergic neurotransmission on learning under uncertainty. We probed the effects of the β-adrenergic receptor antagonist propranolol (40 mg) using a between-subjects, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Participants performed a probabilistic associative learning task, and we employed a hierarchical learning model to formally quantify prediction errors about cue-outcome contingencies and changes in these associations over time (volatility). Both unexpectedness and noise slowed down reaction times, but propranolol augmented the interaction between these main effects such that behavior was influenced more by prior expectations when uncertainty was high. Computationally, this was driven by a reduction in learning rates, with people slower to update their beliefs in the face of new information. Attenuating the global effects of NA also eliminated the phasic effects of prediction error and volatility on pupil size, consistent with slower belief updating. Finally, estimates of environmental volatility were predicted by baseline cardiac measures in all participants. Our results demonstrate that NA underpins behavioral and computational responses to uncertainty. These findings have important implications for understanding the impact of uncertainty on human biology and cognition.

Study authors in this cited reference