Psychometric Properties of the AASPIRE Autistic Burnout Measure - Revised (AABM-R)
This publication is included in the Autistic Autism Scholarship Project. six authors of this publication are identified as autistic in the project.
About the autistic author markerNicolaidis, C., Yang, L. Q., Uretsky, M., Raymaker, D. M., Baker-Ericzen, M., Grillo, V., Kapp, S. K., Kripke-Ludwig, R., Maslak, J., Moura, I., Scharer, M., & Wallington, A. F. (2026). Psychometric Properties of the AASPIRE Autistic Burnout Measure - Revised (AABM-R) [Preprint]. openRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.08.19.26360826
This publication is integrated into AutiHub through:
Authors
Abstract
Background: Autistic Chronic Energy Depletion Syndrome, commonly referred to as Autistic Burnout, is a debilitating condition characterized by exhaustion, loss of function, and reduced tolerance to stimuli. While several instruments attempt to measure it, validation studies have only used cross-sectional designs and/or convenience samples with low support needs, limiting understanding of their performance across heterogeneous, autistic populations and over time. Methods: Using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach, we revised the 27-item AASPIRE Autistic Burnout Measure (AABM) into a 14-item AASPIRE Autistic Burnout Measure-Revised (AABM-R) and tested it in a longitudinal study of 835 autistic adults recruited from healthcare systems, disability services, and the community. Participants completed surveys directly (with or without support) or via a caregiver. We assessed structural validity and measurement invariance using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, tested construct validity through a priori hypothesis testing, examined discriminant validity from depression using longitudinal factor analysis and cross-lagged panel models, and assessed criterion validity using ROC analysis. Results: The AABM-R demonstrated a clear single-factor structure among direct reporters, with and without support, and measurement invariance across these groups; findings were less conclusive for the smaller caregiver-report subsample. Autistic burnout correlated as hypothesized with stressors (e.g., discrimination, masking, adverse childhood experiences), supports (e.g., social support, receiving needed help with daily living activities), and broader outcomes (e.g., quality of life, depression, anxiety). Longitudinal modeling supported autistic burnout as empirically distinct from, though related to, depression. ROC analysis (AUC = 0.89) supported cut-offs distinguishing probable (33-56, LR 7.38), unsure, and unlikely (0-22, LR 0.15) burnout. Conclusions: The AABM-R is a brief, accessible, psychometrically sound measure of autistic burnout suitable for heterogeneous autistic populations, with preliminary clinical cut-offs to guide screening. Further research is needed on the caregiver-report version and on longitudinal predictors and outcomes of burnout.
Bibliography cited by this reference
Cited references are imported from external metadata sources when they are available. The list may be partial.
No cited bibliography is currently integrated for this reference. This does not necessarily mean that no bibliography exists.