Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 30/09/2013 02:41

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Anibal Gutierrez, Aaron J. Fischer, Melissa N. Hale, Jennifer S. Durocher, Michael Alessandri (2013). DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE PATTERNS TO THE CONTROL CONDITION BETWEEN TWO PROCEDURES TO ASSESS SOCIAL REINFORCERS FOR CHILDREN WITH AUTISM. Behavioral Interventions, 28(4), 353-361. Wiley.

Date de publication
24/09/2013
Identifiant
10.1002/bin.1372
Auteurs
Anibal Gutierrez, Aaron J. Fischer, Melissa N. Hale, Jennifer S. Durocher, Michael Alessandri
Source
Behavioral Interventions
Détails
28(4), 353-361
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Historically, reinforcer assessment procedures focus primarily on identifying nonsocial reinforcers (e.g., tangibles and edibles). Far less empirical attention has been allocated to the systematic identification of social consequences that function as reinforcers. This discrepancy is problematic given that social consequences are commonly incorporated into behavioral treatment programs without systematic evaluation of their efficacy. In this study, two methodologies (a single operant and a concurrent choice) were used to assess social reinforcers for children with autism. Results highlighted differences in response allocation to the control condition between procedures. Specifically, responding occurred in the control condition of the single‐operant procedure but not in the concurrent‐operant procedure. These differences highlight the need for further evaluation of procedures to assess social reinforcers. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée