Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 27/08/2013 23:08

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Mehmet A. Coskun, Katherine A. Loveland, Deborah A. Pearson, Andrew C. Papanicolaou, Bhavin R. Sheth (2013). Interaction of Finger Representations in the Cortex of Individuals with Autism: A Functional Window into Cortical Inhibition. Autism Research, 6(6), 542-549. Wiley.

Date de publication
27/08/2013
Identifiant
10.1002/aur.1314
Auteurs
Mehmet A. Coskun, Katherine A. Loveland, Deborah A. Pearson, Andrew C. Papanicolaou, Bhavin R. Sheth
Source
Autism Research
Détails
6(6), 542-549
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

An established neural biomarker of autism spectrum disorder (ASD ) has the potential to provide novel biological and pharmacological targets for treatment. Lower level of inhibition in brain circuits is a leading biomarker candidate. A physiological investigation of the functional levels of inhibition in the cortex of individuals with autism can provide a strong test of the hypothesis. The amplitude of cortical response to the stimulation of adjacent fingers is controlled by the level of cortical inhibition and provides just such a test. Using magnetoencephalography, we recorded the response of the somatosensory cortex to the passive tactile stimulation of the thumb (D1 ), and index finger (D2 ), and to the simultaneous stimulation of both fingers combined (D1, D2 ) of the dominant (right) hand of young subjects with and without autism. For each participant, we measured the response to the stimulation of both fingers combined (D1, D2 ) relative to the post hoc sum of the responses to the stimulation of each finger alone (D1 + D2 ) in multiple different ways and linearly regressed the ASD and neurotypical (NT ) groups' responses. The resulting slopes were then compared: Smaller slope values imply attenuated response to paired finger stimulation, and enhanced levels of inhibition. The short‐latency M 40 and mid‐latency M 80 response slopes of the group with autism obtained in different ways were either significantly smaller, or statistically indistinguishable from NT. The result does not support reduced inhibition in the somatosensory cortex of individuals with autism, contrary to the seminal hypothesis of reduced inhibition. Implications are discussed including refinements of current theory. Autism Res 2013, 6: 542–549. © 2013 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée