Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 05/06/2013 17:56

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

James P Burke, Anjali Jain, Wenya Yang, Jonathan P Kelly, Marygrace Kaiser, Laura Becker, Lindsay Lawer, Craig J Newschaffer (2014). Does a claims diagnosis of autism mean a true case?. Autism, 18(3), 321-330. SAGE Publications.

Date de publication
05/06/2013
Identifiant
10.1177/1362361312467709
Auteurs
James P Burke, Anjali Jain, Wenya Yang, Jonathan P Kelly, Marygrace Kaiser, Laura Becker, Lindsay Lawer, Craig J Newschaffer
Source
Autism
Détails
18(3), 321-330
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
SAGE Publications
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

The purpose of this study was to validate autism spectrum disorder cases identified through claims-based case identification algorithms against a clinical review of medical charts. Charts were reviewed for 432 children who fell into one of the three following groups: (a) more than or equal to two claims with an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis code (n = 182), (b) one claim with an autism spectrum disorder diagnosis code (n = 190), and (c) those who had no claims for autism spectrum disorder but had claims for other developmental or neurological conditions (n = 60). The algorithm-based diagnoses were compared with documented autism spectrum disorders in the medical charts. The algorithm requiring more than or equal to two claims for autism spectrum disorder generated a positive predictive value of 87.4%, which suggests that such an algorithm is a valid means to identify true autism spectrum disorder cases in claims data.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée