Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 14/05/2013 20:14

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Peter G. Enticott, Hayley A. Kennedy, Nicole J. Rinehart, John L. Bradshaw, Bruce J. Tonge, Zafiris J. Daskalakis, Paul B. Fitzgerald (2013). Interpersonal motor resonance in autism spectrum disorder: evidence against a global “mirror system” deficit. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 218-218. Frontiers Media SA.

Date de publication
2013
Identifiant
10.3389/fnhum.2013.00218
Auteurs
Peter G. Enticott, Hayley A. Kennedy, Nicole J. Rinehart, John L. Bradshaw, Bruce J. Tonge, Zafiris J. Daskalakis, Paul B. Fitzgerald
Source
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Détails
7, 218-218
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Frontiers Media SA
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

The mirror neuron hypothesis of autism is highly controversial, in part because there are conflicting reports as to whether putative indices of mirror system activity are actually deficient in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Recent evidence suggests that a typical putative mirror system response may be seen in people with an ASD when there is a degree of social relevance to the visual stimuli used to elicit that response. Individuals with ASD (n = 32) and matched neurotypical controls (n = 32) completed a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) experiment in which the left primary motor cortex (M1) was stimulated during the observation of static hands, individual (i.e., one person) hand actions, and interactive (i.e., two person) hand actions. Motor-evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded from the contralateral first dorsal interosseous, and used to generate an index of interpersonal motor resonance (IMR; a putative measure of mirror system activity) during action observation. There was no difference between ASD and NT groups in the level of IMR during the observation of these actions. These findings provide evidence against a global mirror system deficit in ASD, and this evidence appears to extend beyond stimuli that have social relevance. Attentional and visual processing influences may be important for understanding the apparent role of IMR in the pathophysiology of ASD.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée