Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 20/02/2013 00:48

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Elise B. Robinson, Paul Lichtenstein, Henrik Anckarsäter, Francesca Happé, Angelica Ronald (2013). Examining and interpreting the female protective effect against autistic behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(13), 5258-5262. National Academy of Sciences.

Date de publication
19/02/2013
Identifiant
10.1073/pnas.1211070110
Auteurs
Elise B. Robinson, Paul Lichtenstein, Henrik Anckarsäter, Francesca Happé, Angelica Ronald
Source
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Détails
110(13), 5258-5262
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
National Academy of Sciences
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Male preponderance in autistic behavioral impairment has been explained in terms of a hypothetical protective effect of female sex, yet little research has tested this hypothesis empirically. If females are protected, they should require greater etiologic load to manifest the same degree of impairment as males. The objective of this analysis was to examine whether greater familial etiologic load was associated with quantitative autistic impairments in females compared with males. Subjects included 3,842 dizygotic twin pairs from the Twins Early Development Study (TEDS) and 6,040 dizygotic twin pairs from the Child and Adolescent Twin Study of Sweden (CATSS). In both samples, we compared sibling autistic traits between female and male probands, who were identified as children scoring in the top 90th and 95th percentiles of the population autistic trait distributions. In both TEDS and CATSS, siblings of female probands above the 90th percentile had significantly more autistic impairments than the siblings of male probands above the 90th percentile. The siblings of female probands above the 90th percentile also had greater categorical recurrence risk in both TEDS and CATSS. Results were similar in probands above the 95th percentile. This finding, replicated across two nationally-representative samples, suggests that female sex protects girls from autistic impairments and that girls may require greater familial etiologic load to manifest the phenotype. It provides empirical support for the hypothesis of a female protective effect against autistic behavior and can be used to inform and interpret future gene finding efforts in autism spectrum disorders.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée