Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 11/12/2012 00:36

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Justin B. Leaf, Kathleen H. Tsuji, Amy E. Lentell, Stephanie E. Dale, Alyne Kassardjian, Mitchell Taubman, John McEachin, Ronald Leaf, et al. (2013). A COMPARISON OF DISCRETE TRIAL TEACHING IMPLEMENTED IN A ONE‐TO‐ONE INSTRUCTIONAL FORMAT AND IN A GROUP INSTRUCTIONAL FORMAT. Behavioral Interventions, 28(1), 82-106. Wiley.

Date de publication
20/11/2012
Identifiant
10.1002/bin.1357
Auteurs
Justin B. Leaf, Kathleen H. Tsuji, Amy E. Lentell, Stephanie E. Dale, Alyne Kassardjian, Mitchell Taubman, John McEachin, Ronald Leaf, Misty L. Oppenheim‐Leaf
Source
Behavioral Interventions
Détails
28(1), 82-106
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Discrete trial teaching (DTT) is a systematic form of intervention commonly implemented with children and adolescents diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Experimenters and clinicians have implemented DTT in both one‐to‐one instructional formats and group instructional formats to teach a wide variety of skills to children and adolescents diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. The purpose of this study was to compare DTT implemented in a one‐to‐one instructional format with DTT implemented in a group instructional format in order to determine which format was more effective, efficient, resulted in higher observational learning, and resulted in better maintenance when teaching a variety of expressive skills. The experimenters utilized a parallel treatment design, and the results indicated that both instructional formats were equally effective, there were mixed results in terms of maintenance and efficiency, and group instruction resulted in observational learning. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée