Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 06/06/2012 03:50

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Lien intégré au billet

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Evan F. Risko, Kaitlin Laidlaw, Megan Freeth, Tom Foulsham, Alan Kingstone (2012). Social attention with real versus reel stimuli: toward an empirical approach to concerns about ecological validity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 143-143. Frontiers Media SA.

Date de publication
2012
Identifiant
10.3389/fnhum.2012.00143
Auteurs
Evan F. Risko, Kaitlin Laidlaw, Megan Freeth, Tom Foulsham, Alan Kingstone
Source
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Détails
6, 143-143
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Frontiers Media SA
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Cognitive neuroscientists often study social cognition by using simple but socially relevant stimuli, such as schematic faces or images of other people. Whilst this research is valuable, important aspects of genuine social encounters are absent from these studies, a fact that has recently drawn criticism. In the present review we argue for an empirical approach to the determination of the equivalence of different social stimuli. This approach involves the systematic comparison of different types of social stimuli ranging in their approximation to a real social interaction. In garnering support for this cognitive ethological approach, we focus on recent research in social attention that has involved stimuli ranging from simple schematic faces to real social interactions. We highlight both meaningful similarities and differences in various social attentional phenomena across these different types of social stimuli thus validating the utility of the research initiative. Furthermore, we argue that exploring these similarities and differences will provide new insights into social cognition and social neuroscience.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée