Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 02/04/2012 02:55

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

2 ressources citées

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Amitta Shah, Uta Frith (1983). AN ISLET OF ABILITY IN AUTISTIC CHILDREN: A RESEARCH NOTE. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 24(4), 613-620. Wiley.

Date de publication
07/12/2006
Identifiant
10.1111/j.1469-7610.1983.tb00137.x
Auteurs
Amitta Shah, Uta Frith
Source
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Détails
24(4), 613-620
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

SUMMARY An aspect of cognitive functioning in autistic children was investigated by comparing their performance on the Children's Embedded Figures Test with that of MA‐matched normal and MA‐and CA‐matched mentally retarded non‐autistic children. The autistic children were significantly more competent at this task than either group of control children, and also showed qualitatively different strategies. Since the performance of the autistic children was better than predicted from MA and commensurate with CA, it can be regarded as an islet of ability. This finding is discussed in terms of orientation and visualization factors involved in visuo‐spatial abilities and is also related to cognitive deficit.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Amitta Shah, Uta Frith (1993). Why Do Autistic Individuals Show Superior Performance on the Block Design Task?. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34(8), 1351-1364. Wiley.

Date de publication
07/12/2006
Identifiant
10.1111/j.1469-7610.1993.tb02095.x
Auteurs
Amitta Shah, Uta Frith
Source
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Détails
34(8), 1351-1364
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract— Systematic variations of the block design task were given to 20 autistic, 33 normal and 12 mildly retarded subjects Designs were contrasted which were either “whole” or segmented, rotated or un rotated, and which did or did not contain obliques. Only segmentation, but neither of the spatial orientation factors, revealed a significant group difference. Autistic subjects, regardless of age and ability, performed better than controls when presented with un segmented designs. This result suggests that they need less of the normally required effort to segment a gestalt, and thus supports the hypothesis of weak central coherence as a characteristic of information processing in autism.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée