Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 11/02/2012 18:18

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Lien intégré au billet

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Jennifer A. Bremser, Gordon G. Gallup (2012). Mental State Attribution and Body Configuration in Women. Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience, 4, 1-1. Frontiers Media SA.

Date de publication
2012
Identifiant
10.3389/fnevo.2012.00001
Auteurs
Jennifer A. Bremser, Gordon G. Gallup
Source
Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience
Détails
4, 1-1
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Frontiers Media SA
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Body configuration is a sexually dimorphic trait. In humans, men tend to have high shoulder-to-hip ratios. Women in contrast, often have low waist-to-hip ratios (WHR); i.e., narrow waists and broad hips that approximate an hour-glass configuration. Women with low WHR's are rated as more attractive, healthier, and more fertile. They also tend to have more attractive voices, lose their virginity sooner, and have more sex partners. WHR has also been linked with general cognitive performance. In the present study we expand upon previous research examining the role of WHR in cognition. We hypothesized that more feminine body types, as indexed by a low WHR, would be associated with cognitive measures of the female "brain type," such as mental state attribution and empathy because both may depend upon the activational effects of estrogens at puberty. We found that women with low WHRs excel at identifying emotional states of other people and show a cognitive style that favors empathizing over systemizing. We suggest this relationship may be a byproduct of greater gluteofemoral fat stores which are high in the essential fatty acids needed to support brain development and cellular functioning. It is interesting to note that our findings suggest lower WHR females, who are more likely to be targeted for dishonest courtship, may be better at identifying disingenuous claims of commitment.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée