Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 27/10/2011 20:27

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Gwyneth Doherty‐Sneddon, Deborah M. Riby, Lisa Whittle (2012). Gaze aversion as a cognitive load management strategy in autism spectrum disorder and Williams syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(4), 420-430. Wiley.

Date de publication
26/10/2011
Identifiant
10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02481.x
Auteurs
Gwyneth Doherty‐Sneddon, Deborah M. Riby, Lisa Whittle
Source
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Détails
53(4), 420-430
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Background: During face‐to‐face questioning, typically developing children and adults use gaze aversion (GA), away from their questioner, when thinking. GA increases with question difficulty and improves the accuracy of responses. This is the first study to investigate whether individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD; associated with reduced sociability and atypical face gaze) and Williams syndrome (WS; associated with hypersociability and atypical face gaze) use GA to manage cognitive load during face‐to‐face interactions. Methods: Two studies were conducted exploring the typicality of GA during face‐to‐face questioning in (a) ASD and (b) WS. Results: In Study 1, children with ASD increased their GA as question difficulty increased. In addition, they used most GA when thinking about their responses to questions, mirroring evidence from typically developing children. An important atypicality for participants with ASD was a significantly higher level of GA when listening to interlocutors. In Study 2, participants with WS showed typical patterns of GA in relation to question difficulty and across different points of the interaction. Conclusions: Two different neuro‐developmental disorders, both characterized by significant problems with executive control of attention and atypicalities of social interactions, exhibited generally typical patterns of GA. All groups used most GA while thinking about questions, and increased their GA as questions got harder. In addition, children with ASD showed elevated levels of GA while listening to questions, but not while thinking about or making their responses, suggesting that they sometimes fail to see the relevance of attending to visual cues rather than actively avoiding them. Results have important implications for how professionals interpret GA in these populations and for social skills training.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée