Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 15/09/2026 11:44

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Kathryn A. McNaughton, Heather A. Yarger, Elizabeth Redcay (2026). Automated Quantification of Head Motion Synchrony in Peer Interactions of Autistic and Non‐Autistic Youth. Developmental Science, 29(6), e70285. Wiley.

Date de publication
14/09/2026
Identifiant
10.1111/desc.70285
Auteurs
Kathryn A. McNaughton, Heather A. Yarger, Elizabeth Redcay
Source
Developmental Science
Détails
29(6), e70285
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

ABSTRACT Peer interactions take on increasing importance for youth in middle childhood and adolescence. Autistic youth face particular challenges interacting with non‐autistic peers; thus, it is critical to understand factors that predict interaction enjoyment for autistic and non‐autistic youth. One candidate predictor is interpersonal motion synchrony. Experimentally induced motion synchrony leads to interpersonal liking and closeness, but these outcomes from experimental synchrony may not generalize to synchrony that naturally occurs in interpersonal interactions. Computer vision approaches allow for non‐invasive quantification of synchrony in developmental populations, and thus provide an opportunity to investigate the role of naturalistic motion synchrony in peer interactions between autistic and non‐autistic youth. Autistic and non‐autistic youth were paired into three dyad types (autistic with autistic, autistic with non‐autistic, and non‐autistic with non‐autistic) and completed a brief video‐recorded “getting‐to‐know‐you” interaction. Head position was extracted frame‐by‐frame from video recordings using OpenPose. Cross‐wavelet coherence was computed to quantify head motion synchrony. We found significant head motion synchrony in interacting (compared to time‐scrambled) dyads, but levels of synchrony did not differ by dyad type. Across dyad types, we found evidence that head motion synchrony negatively predicts youth‐reported enjoyment and positively predicts youth‐reported discomfort in the interaction. Unlike prior findings of relations between synchrony and positive outcomes, here, synchrony predicted negative conversational outcomes. Thus, these findings add nuance to our understanding of the role of synchrony in naturalistic interactions. They also demonstrate the application of non‐invasively quantifying synchrony in minimally structured peer interactions including autistic youth using computer vision.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée