Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 30/06/2026 12:06

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet

In autistics & others subject to ABA procedures, "renewal" of "challenging behavior" onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/... "renewal can pose significant challenges for clinicians and caregivers implementing treatment"?--behavior analysts ignore harms to autistics from ABA procedures, again

Voir sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Matthew J. O'Brien, Alexander M. Pauls, Sara R. Jeglum, Carla N. Martinez‐Perez, Christopher T. Franck, Ishita Aggarwal, Christopher A. Podlesnik (2026). Latency and persistence of renewal in an intensive outpatient clinic. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 59(3), e70071. Wiley.

Date de publication
29/06/2026
Identifiant
10.1002/jaba.70071
Auteurs
Matthew J. O'Brien, Alexander M. Pauls, Sara R. Jeglum, Carla N. Martinez‐Perez, Christopher T. Franck, Ishita Aggarwal, Christopher A. Podlesnik
Source
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Détails
59(3), e70071
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract Treatment durability can be compromised when challenging behavior recurs following context changes (i.e., renewal), yet the temporal features of lapses have not been well described in large clinical samples. We examined latency to onset and persistence of renewal to inform clinical monitoring and planning following context changes. Using a retrospective consecutive case series of 98 patients receiving intensive outpatient treatment for challenging behavior, we analyzed 749 context changes involving person, setting, and task variables. Renewal emerged quickly (M = 1–2 sessions), with half beginning in the first postchange session. Persistence was often brief (49.74% resolved within one session), whereas 32.28% persisted for three or more sessions and 12.17% for five or more. Latency and persistence did not differ meaningfully across context‐change types. Latency was not systematically associated with magnitude or persistence, whereas greater renewal magnitude predicted prolonged persistence. Results support extended monitoring and high‐fidelity implementation following context changes.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée