Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 19/11/2025 11:26

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

"the term ‘profound Autism’ does not say anything about that person’s support needs, and can imply that those who do not meet the criteria for ‘profound Autism’ cannot be profoundly disabled..."? what criteria? journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/... neurodiversity terminology online survey, free

Voir sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Aimee Grant, Jennifer Leigh, Monique Botha, Stephen J. Macdonald, Kathryn Williams, Gemma Williams, Kieran Rose, Ann Memmott, et al. (2025). ‘A Lovely Safe Umbrella to Describe Yourself With’ or ‘Meaningless’: An Online Survey of UK-Based Neurodivergent Adults’ Views of Neurodiversity-Related Terminology. Neurodiversity, 3, 27546330251390590. SAGE Publications.

Date de publication
09/11/2025
Identifiant
10.1177/27546330251390590
Auteurs
Aimee Grant, Jennifer Leigh, Monique Botha, Stephen J. Macdonald, Kathryn Williams, Gemma Williams, Kieran Rose, Ann Memmott, Amy Pearson
Source
Neurodiversity
Détails
3, 27546330251390590
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
SAGE Publications
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Background: Neurodivergence refers to people with ways of behaving and thinking that diverge from the norm. Examples include Autism, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), dyspraxia, dyslexia and Tourette syndrome. Neurodivergent people report being stigmatised, including by language. The language preferences of neurodivergent adults have been largely restricted to studies focused on single forms of neurodivergence, primarily Autism. Methods: We undertook an online survey with 901 neurodivergent adults from the UK, focused on their use of and thoughts about terminology related to neurodivergence, including terms such as ‘neurodiversity’ and ‘neurodivergence’. Analysis utilised descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Results: Almost all participants (98.8%) had heard of neurodiversity, and 74.8% used neurodiversity terminology. We developed three themes. First, ‘an umbrella term’, focused on the positive and negative aspects of how ‘neurodivergence’ incorporated multiple forms of neurodivergence. Second, ‘understanding of neurodivergence (vs. neurodiverse)’, centred around a lack of understanding of neurodiversity terminology. Third, ‘stigma and identity’ focused on neurodiversity terminology's potential to reduce stigma, and simultaneously increase stigma towards individual types of neurodivergence, including Autism and ADHD. Conclusion: Those providing services to neurodivergent people should generally use neurodiversity terminology correctly, but could also mirror the individual's language choices when communicating one-to-one.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée