Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 31/10/2025 11:23

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

"In multifeature designs, autistic adults showed larger MMN amplitudes, whereas autistic children and adolescents displayed reduced MMN amplitudes"? onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/... "findings may reflect a developmental shift toward high and inflexible prediction errors in autistic adults"?

Voir sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Laurie‐Anne Sapey‐Triomphe, Romain Bouet, Jérémie Mattout, Sandrine Sonié, Christina Schmitz, Françoise Lecaignard (2025). Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Mismatch Negativity in Autism: Insights Into Predictive Mechanisms. Autism Research, 18(12), 2431-2450. Wiley.

Date de publication
30/10/2025
Identifiant
10.1002/aur.70131
Auteurs
Laurie‐Anne Sapey‐Triomphe, Romain Bouet, Jérémie Mattout, Sandrine Sonié, Christina Schmitz, Françoise Lecaignard
Source
Autism Research
Détails
18(12), 2431-2450
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

ABSTRACT Mismatch negativity (MMN) has been frequently used to assess auditory processing and change detection in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), but findings have been fairly inconsistent. To address this issue, we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of MMN amplitude (76 effect sizes) and latency (62 effect sizes) in ASD to identify factors contributing to this heterogeneity and to interpret findings within the predictive coding framework. While residual heterogeneity remained, significant effects of the interaction between age group and design type (unifeature vs. multifeature, i.e., one or several types of deviants) and deviant type were found for MMN amplitude. In multifeature designs, autistic children and adolescents exhibited reduced MMN amplitudes compared to neurotypical peers (g = 0.25, p = 0.01), whereas autistic adults showed increased MMN amplitudes (g = −0.26, p = 0.02). In addition, autistic individuals had significantly smaller MMN amplitudes than neurotypical individuals in paradigms using phoneme deviants (g = 0.41, p < 0.001). Across designs, no significant MMN latency differences were observed between neurotypical and autistic individuals. These results are discussed within the predictive coding framework, as MMN responses are thought to reflect prediction errors, aligning with theories suggesting heightened prediction errors in autistic adults. Future studies with larger samples and improved data reporting are needed to further clarify the developmental trajectory and variability of MMN responses in ASD. Additionally, computational modeling approaches can help characterize learning dynamics and disentangle predictive coding accounts among autistic individuals.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée