Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 02/08/2025 11:20

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

"It tests the ability to label emotions and metalize from 36 photographs..."? "For social cognition, emotion recognition and metalizing..."? metalize? metalizing? (see pages 3 & 6) onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/... cross-sectional study relating some EF & social measures in autistic adults

Voir sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

T. R. Wong, K. A. Boulton, E. A. Demetriou, E. E. Thomas, N. L. Phillips, L. Hankin, S. H. Park, I. B. Hickie, et al. (2025). Executive Function and Social Cognition Performance Predicts Social Difficulty for Autistic Adults. Autism Research, 18(9), 1734-1745. Wiley.

Date de publication
01/08/2025
Identifiant
10.1002/aur.70090
Auteurs
T. R. Wong, K. A. Boulton, E. A. Demetriou, E. E. Thomas, N. L. Phillips, L. Hankin, S. H. Park, I. B. Hickie, A. J. Guastella
Source
Autism Research
Détails
18(9), 1734-1745
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

ABSTRACT There has been limited research aimed at understanding the cognitive features that predict outcomes in autistic adults. Difficulties in social cognition and executive function (EF) processes have been proposed as important cognitive components underlying social functioning outcomes. In this study, 305 autistic adults were administered a battery of social cognition, EF, and social functioning assessments to determine the degree to which social cognition and EF factors predicted outcomes. For social cognition, hierarchical regressions showed that EF explained neither theory of mind scores nor emotion recognition scores. We then ran several mediation models to determine whether EF explained social functioning independently of social cognition. These exploratory analyses show that poorer performance‐based EF and social cognition both predicted more clinician‐observed social challenges, while poorer self‐reported EF and social cognition predicted more self‐reported social challenges. Effects on outcomes were independent of each other. Our results highlight the potential of bot EF and social cognition measures to provide clinically meaningful markers for social functioning, but via separate pathways. This study supports the utility of targeting EF and social cognition processes in autistic adults in assessment and support pathways.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée