Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 02/04/2025 11:29

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

"transdiagnostic dimensional alternatives" vs "the diagnostic conceptualization of autism"? onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/... "While RDoC and HiTOP hold significant promise, they are still evolving and are not yet ready to replace the conceptualization of autism provided by the DSM or ICD"?

Voir sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Lacey C. Chetcuti, Emily K. Spackman, Thomas W. Frazier, Andrew J. O. Whitehouse, Mirko Uljarević (2025). The autism phenotype and transdiagnostic dimensional frameworks. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 67(9), 1130-1136. Wiley.

Date de publication
24/03/2025
Identifiant
10.1111/dmcn.16303
Auteurs
Lacey C. Chetcuti, Emily K. Spackman, Thomas W. Frazier, Andrew J. O. Whitehouse, Mirko Uljarević
Source
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Détails
67(9), 1130-1136
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract A reliable and valid diagnostic classification system is pivotal for guiding clinical decision‐making, facilitating rigorous and reproducible research findings, informing population‐level health planning and resource allocation, and promoting well‐being. However, the current categorical approaches, while foundational, have inherent limitations, including symptom overlap between diagnostic categories, heterogeneity, instability, unreliability, and a limited capacity to quantify individual variations. We outline several challenges regarding the diagnostic conceptualization of autism and propose how transdiagnostic dimensional alternatives might facilitate a more comprehensive understanding, assessment, and clinical care for this complex clinical condition. Research Domain Criteria and Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology are two distinct yet complementary dimensional approaches that have garnered the most empirical attention. In this review, we outline the central tenets of each approach in turn and explore their potential applications in enhancing understanding and addressing challenges associated with autism in both research and clinical practice.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée