Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 21/03/2025 11:13

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Lien intégré au billet

ABA programs harming autistics, again: "challenging behavior resurged for most participants (75%), applications (80%), and transitions (60%) and tended to increase to clinically significant levels" onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/... "clinicians may expect resurgence to occur often..."

Voir sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Kendall M. Kastner, Stephanie A. Hood, Daniel R. Mitteer (2025). An evaluation of durability during and following delay‐and‐denial tolerance teaching. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 58(2), 344-362. Wiley.

Date de publication
21/03/2025
Identifiant
10.1002/jaba.70007
Auteurs
Kendall M. Kastner, Stephanie A. Hood, Daniel R. Mitteer
Source
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Détails
58(2), 344-362
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract Across five treatment applications, we evaluated two forms of treatment relapse (renewal, resurgence) with a version of functional communication training known as delay‐and‐denial tolerance teaching. Renewal of challenging behavior following a context change occurred for most treatments, but challenging behavior did not increase to clinically significant levels in most cases. Resurgence of challenging behavior following decrements in alternative reinforcement occurred only in two of five extinction tests when communication responses were placed on extinction. Omitting alternative activities during extinction tests led to an appreciable increase in resurgence for one of the three participants who did not display resurgence initially. Despite promising findings during the extinction test, resurgence frequently occurred during most treatments when thinning reinforcement for communication responses. When resurgence occurred during schedule thinning, it tended to be at clinically significant magnitudes. We discuss these findings in relation to the larger literature on treatment relapse.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée