Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 24/08/2023 22:03

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

1 réponse intégrée de Michelle Dawson

24/08/2023 22:15

Note: in this study, nonautistics (mean age 22.53 years) are "considerably younger" than autistics (mean age 36.12 years) & "ratio of female to male participants is considerably higher in the autistic group (23 females, 10 males) than the nonautistic group (16 females, 18 males)"

Voir la réponse sur Twitter/X

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Lorne M. Hartman, Mehrdad Farahani, Alexander Moore, Ateeya Rabbani, Braxton L. Hartman (2023). Organizational benefits of neurodiversity: Preliminary findings on autism and the bystander effect. Autism Research, 16(10), 1989-2001. Wiley.

Date de publication
24/08/2023
Identifiant
10.1002/aur.3012
Auteurs
Lorne M. Hartman, Mehrdad Farahani, Alexander Moore, Ateeya Rabbani, Braxton L. Hartman
Source
Autism Research
Détails
16(10), 1989-2001
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract Although the bystander effect is one of the most important findings in the psychological literature, researchers have not explored whether autistic individuals are prone to the bystander effect. The present research examines whether autistic employees are more likely to report issues or concerns in an organization's systems and practices that are inefficient or dysfunctional. By bringing attention to these issues, autistic employees may foster opportunities to improve organizational performance, leading to the development of a more adaptive, high performing, and ethical culture. Thirty‐three autistic employees and 34 nonautistic employees completed an online survey to determine whether employees on the autism spectrum (1) are more likely to report they would voice concerns about organizational dysfunctions, (2) are less likely to report they were influenced by the number of other witnesses to the dysfunction, (3) if they do not voice concerns, are more likely to acknowledge the influence of other people on the decision, (4) are less likely to formulate “elaborate rationales” for their decisions to intervene or not, and (5) whether any differences between autistic and nonautistic employees with regards to the first two hypotheses, intervention likelihood and degree of influence, are moderated by individual differences in camouflaging. Results indicate that autistic employees may be less susceptible to the bystander effect than nonautistic employees. As a result, autistic employees may contribute to improvements in organizational performance because they are more likely to identify and report inefficient processes and dysfunctional practices when they witness them. These preliminary findings suggesting potential benefits of neurodiversity in the workplace are promising. However, further research is required.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée