Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 25/02/2023 09:18

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Karen Leneh Buckle, Ellen Poliakoff, Emma Gowen (2023). The blind men and the elephant: The case for a transdiagnostic approach to initiation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1113579. Frontiers Media SA.

Date de publication
07/02/2023
Identifiant
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1113579
Auteurs
Karen Leneh Buckle, Ellen Poliakoff, Emma Gowen
Source
Frontiers in Psychology
Détails
13, 1113579
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Frontiers Media SA
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Difficulty initiating voluntary action is an under-recognized and often invisible impairment in various psychiatric, neurodevelopmental, and neurological conditions. Understanding the commonalities of volition impairments across diagnoses is limited by a lack of consistent terminology, arbitrary distinctions between conditions, the habit of looking only to the prevailing definitions and theories to explain observed traits, and the covert nature of initiation. The siloed approach to research in this area evokes the parable of the blind men and the elephant, where understanding the whole picture is impeded by a limited view. There has been little effort to consider how differing terms overlap or to use objective methods to differentiate phenomena along meaningful lines. We propose a triad of interacting elements, all of which are needed for successful initiation of voluntary action: (i) executive function, (ii) volition, and (iii) movement. Failure to initiate a response may be due to impairments in any of these, which often co-occur. This paper calls for the following considerations to improve research in this area: (i) put aside preconceptions about conditions and their mechanisms to adopt a flexible transdiagnostic approach; (ii) consider executive function, movement, and volition as possible dimensional variations with related underlying mechanisms; (iii) carefully differentiate components of complex functions; (iv) look to first-hand reports for covert and previously unrecognized traits. These approaches have the potential to elucidate the cognitive and biological mechanisms underpinning voluntary action and create a foundation to develop more appropriate and informed interventions.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée